• crystalmerchant@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yeah no shit, and you do think I have a single goddamn bit of influence over my corporation’s choice of email client??

    • remotelove@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      They can leech all the data they want from my employer. I don’t give a fuck. Never use company assets for personal business as an addendum.

      Just be a little more careful with your own stuff, s’all.

        • Otter@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          A lot of healthcare and education institutions use Outlook as well, so I wouldn’t be surprised if mental health or legal uses it too. There may be rules about what kind of client/student/patient information can be sent over email, and often there are healthcare/institution specific variants of the office suites which (are supposed to) meet regulatory requirements

          I think the other comment applies regardless. Do work things on the work device/account and let the workplace handle any other concerns. When it comes time to discuss alternatives, you can make a case for something else

    • Elven_Mithril@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      well, as far as you use it just for your work, who cares, right? It’s the same as I’d never use Lastpass, my corp use it and even offered it for our personal use :D thanks, but no thanks! For personal use I would never use any microsoft solution.

  • gedaliyah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Outlook honestly was not that bad for a while, but of course Microsoft does what Microsoft does. I’ve been using Thunderbird for about a year now and it is very full featured coming directly from outlook.

  • PlantObserver@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Hey Proton how about you quit privacy-washing and actually prioritize and release feature parity products for Linux so your customers aren’t being herded onto windows’ data harvesting platform just so they can use your supposedly privacy forward products

    • helenslunch@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The Linux Experiment recently interviewed the CEO who answered this question.

      Basically it’s the same as anything else. Linux requires more effort to code for due to its variety of distributions, and has a significantly smaller userbase.

      In short, don’t blame Proton, blame the (lack of) users.

      • 1995ToyotaCorolla@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I mean, can’t you just package your app in flatpack or even snap? Bam, your app works on 99% of distributions for little effort. That’s what Spotify does, and I’d argue they have even less incentive to support Linux than proton does

        • helenslunch@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I don’t know, I’m not a developer. Lots of companies don’t make their products available on Linux, most cite similar reasoning, so it’s unsurprising. But I agree it’s disappointing. I really wish Linux was more user-friendly.

        • cley_faye@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Sure, as long as you don’t need any integration with other software, don’t need arbitrary IPC, and actually keep some dependencies in line with some common denominator because there’s only so much you can do with static linking (oh excuse me, distributing the shared libraries in the same package as your binaries as if it’s a new thing) once it reach the “program must actually run” part.

          Flatpack and every other similar solution that are described as “works everywhere” always come with a heck of limitations.

        • slst@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          He also answered this claim, it is right for apps that aren’t stuff like Proton VPN that can’t work in a sandboxed environment. They are working on it iirc

  • Ugurcan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    On that topic, is there an alternative for a mail client + calendar for Win 11 that doesn’t look and feel like a Windows 95 exe named Thunderbird?

    • KᑌᔕᕼIᗩ@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Thunderbird did get a UI overhaul semi-recently so it might offer what you’re after now.

      I also liked eM Client which has a free version.