• JackbyDev@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    11 days ago

    Gee, I wonder if Aryansoldier1488 knows if 1488 is a dog whistle for Nazis? I’d hate for Aryansoldier to get caught up in this. It was probably a random number.

    • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 days ago

      Poor guy was probably just born on 1/4/1988 and his real name is just Ayra N Soldier. People these days just call everybody a Nazi smh /s

      • frezik@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 days ago

        As a radical centrist, I must find any possible reason that someone would stick an obvious dogwhistle in their name besides being a Nazi. We can’t just go assuming the blatantly obvious.

  • jsomae@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    11 days ago

    I do feel bad for people born in the year 1488 though, their usernames look really suspicious.

    • Bubs12@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      12 days ago

      The 14 refers to “The Fourteen Words”

      “We must secure the existence of our people and a future for white children”

      • merc@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 days ago

        It’s funny because it’s hardly an inspiring or memorable 14 word sentence. It’s just awkward and clunky.

        Like, why “secure”? Why not “safeguard” or “defend”? IMO those are stronger, more emotionally resonant words.

        And why “existence”? Why not something stronger like “survival” or something more than survival like “prosperity”?

        And just “a future” for white children? Not “a glorious future” or “a triumphant future”?

        And, why “white children”? Not the white race?

        Also, how is “a future for white children” distinct from “the existence of our people”? Are white children distinct from “our people”?

        I could get it if it were framed as: we must defend our survival now so that our children can prosper. In that case you’re saying that the present might be tough but the future will be bright. But they’re not painting the future as bright, just “a future”, which is really the same as an “existence” so it’s basically saying “Our people must survive and so must our children, who are also our people, but smaller.”

        Like, they memorized the first draft of some dumb saying and revere it as “the 14 words”, but it’s just badly written, nevermind all the racism.

        • Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          11 days ago

          “Secure” doesn’t just mean “defend” or “safeguard”. “Secure” also means “capture”, so it implies you need to go out and get it, like with invasions or something maybe, idk. It’s a lot less passive.

          “Existence” means both “survival” and “prosperity”. It implies that both their existence is under threat, while creating the idea that they might be able to make it better. Maybe they could, idk, make america great again, trying to return to some mythical prelapsarian era by beating back the eternal threat.

          “A future” does this too, implying they may not have a future at all.

          And talking about the “children” brings up the concept of making new people, evoking the idea that non-white races are out-breeding them. It also includes the common “think of the children” idea.

          And finally the fact that it’s short and boring comes from the fact that nazis are uninspiring and uninspired, and they need a simple, to the point slogan to repeat without thinking about it too hard. They certainly know how to make a message concise, even at the cost of saying almost nothing of meaning when you think too hard about it.

          All of this is classic fascism.

        • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 days ago

          It’s the same tactic as the “It’s OK to be white” or “White lives matter” slogans, but more clever because it leaves enough ambiguity such that just about anything can be justified under it. It mentions children to come across as more innocent and to implicitly accuse the opposition of endangering children (also playing into LGBT scaremongering, with the Nazis using the same tropes they use today). “Think of the children!” is a common and effective propaganda line.

          Saying “future” instead of “glorious future” suggests that the children wouldn’t have a future at all otherwise. That the white race is under attack and is otherwise on track to be eliminated by Jews and communists and so forth. It’s harder to justify atrocities in the name of “a glorious future” vs “a regular future” as opposed to “a regular future” vs “we are completely exterminated ourselves.”

          It is, of course, bullshit, because it’s literally Nazi propaganda trying to frame them as on the “defensive,” but it is carefully and intelligently crafted propaganda. It’s important to understand the enemy and their approaches in order to better counter their movements and defeat them, they should not be underestimated.

    • considine@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 days ago

      88 is a lucky number in Vietnam. You’ll see Vietnamese restaurants use 88 in their name sometimes.

      Different cultures, different meanings. Not that Nazis are a culture. They are distinctly uncultured.

  • Oka@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 days ago

    Shoutout to DarkViperAU (formerly DarkViper88, because of birth year)

    • snooggums@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      12 days ago

      That looks like screenshot from any user to me. The highlighting is the same as me taking a screenshot of a comment where I @ someone else. It also looks the same when I see someone else’s comment @ someone else.

      Edit: thank you all for down voting me for admitting that I didn’t notice the difference in the background and replied thinking they might be referring to the name highlighting. Clearly I must have been disagreeing with the comment I replied to and not just trying to learn something!

  • NovaOG@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    12 days ago

    What do we call a Discord that allows nazis in it? A Nazi Discord.

      • xttweaponttx@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 days ago

        Nnnooooo god is it really? I fucking despise discord but I have a couple dipshit friend groups that refuse to shift off the platform (hard to argue w/ Xbox integration)… Jfc if that shit goes public its downhill from an already downhill slope 😭 horrendous