• AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      The music industry figured it out: I listen to way more music than ever before and I willingly pay more than ever before

      Video streaming keeps trying to make my experience more frustrating, less value to me. They’re scrounging for dollars is driving me away. I’ve considered my options for making video entertainment enjoyable again, and I’m just tired of the whole thing. I’m spending more time in projects, more time online, more time reading ebooks from my library. I’m watching less video than before, enjoying it less, getting less value for my money and it’s just all not worth it. Their efforts to profit more from my attention are getting them less of it and losing my willingness to pay

      • abhibeckert@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        The big difference is exclusive content. Music has a few exceptions but in general sign up for one service and you can listen to anything.

        That forces music services to compete on the overall experience (and price), while video services pretty much exclusively compete based on what content is available and literally none of them offer all of the things a person wants to watch. So nobody will ever be happy with any streaming service.

    • snownyte@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      You’re correct.

      Social Media is the perfect example of this. Everytime a new social media network arrives, they always boast about being able to do things you could already have done with the other 9 social media networks. Sharing pictures and video, chatting .etc. They’re all things we could’ve already have done far way back in the days of messaging software like AIM. It’s nothing new, it’s just recycled ideas being treated as new.

      The only things that have ever improved were the amount of size of videos and pictures we can share and the speed in which we’re able to do it with. That’s it.

      The well of finding new ideas has ran dry, because they’ve all been tried and done before many times. New name, same old shit.

  • redeyejedi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    Yes, but no. Cable didn’t used to let you watch all seasons of a specific show on any given day and time of your choosing.

    • snownyte@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Pretty much.

      If you missed an episode of a show on cable television. Well, you’re shit out of luck unless it’s a show that the network didn’t mind running re-runs of, but re-runs only applied for shows that were popular. And if you missed an episode of a show that wasn’t popular, again you were shit out of luck and hope to one day acquire it through a VHS or a DVD or these days, blu-ray or on streaming.

      Network programming was always like this.

  • teamevil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    That article was worthless… basically streaming is expensive and not as awesome as it once was. There you go whole article

  • snownyte@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Um, duh?

    Is the author just noticing this? We’ve been piecing this together for the past 7 some odd years. The day hit us was when YouTube decided to be cute by adding in it’s own network via YouTubeTV and with it’s onslaught of ads.