Remarkably similar to human thinking.
Remarkably similar to human thinking.
Me fail English? That’s unpossible!
Oh yeah, missed that. Yes, make me woke, please!
Man, I’d be pretty pissed to be woken up from a coma the way things are going now.
But the user is choosing, to, not the instance.
True, but literally any game can be an “older” game by that definition.
This is why having different instances is great. If I feel like one is too heavy-handed with blocking others, I can just use another one that isn’t and choose what I want to block.
I first noticed the issue with .world when discussion of Luigi was censored there in December. That’s why I’m not on there any more. They’re too eager to toe the line and appear corpo friendly like reddit.
As long as it’s the user doing it, not instances.
You don’t have to actually believe them, just say them.
Oh, okay. Seems odd to call a 2 year old game an “older” game.
Where have all the “humans” gone?
Gone to graveyards, every one
When will they ever learn?
“Buffy Oak. A small location where the people just sit around all day and enjoy each other’s company. They talk, laugh, and sing without ever arguing, drawing daggers, and dying in a gurgling rush of blood. A truly bizarre place.”
According to the article, they mean 6 years old or older.
This specifically referred to classical studies. Disney’s take is not a part of that.
Nah, we got Strange New Worlds, Lower Decks, and Picard season 3.
Not really. That’s a 700 year gap. A LOT can happen in 700 years; Star Trek itself was only set 300 years in the future when it was released.
It’s easier to get a game made in Japan that’s the singular vision of a passionate developer. In the US they’re typically made by committee.
Her eyes being all the way open look even stranger than her mouth.