• prole
    link
    fedilink
    English
    81 year ago

    Who fucking cares about profit, our planet is dying.

    • @Heavybell@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -21 year ago

      The planet is fine, and will be fine after we’ve gone, much like it was fine after the other mass extinctions. What’s dying is the environment that supports human life. Less snappy, granted, but I feel like emphasising that this is our problem and not something we should do for others might be worthwhile.

      • prole
        link
        fedilink
        English
        41 year ago

        Do you never get tired of being pointlessly pedantic? Yes, the planet, as in the big rock floating in space, will continue to exist. Thanks.

    • @Dr_pepper_spray@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 year ago

      I care. I care that we don’t make a rash decision for a potential short term solution. Why not ramp up solar / wind and other alternatives?

      • @escapesamsara@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        English
        31 year ago

        Storage, we have less Lithium than you seem to think, and pumped hydro is not a solution – not that it’s not a universal solution, it’s simply not a solution. Implementation costs more than a nuclear reactor and maintenance and security costs are way, way higher than a nuclear reactor. We, unless you want to adopt a powerless overnight lifestyle, need on-demand power generation. Nuclear is the best, safest, cleanest, most feasible option for that until we remove all precious metals from energy storage technology.

        • @rusticus@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          01 year ago

          I disagree. Nuclear is too slow costly and a huge security risk for an already unsafe grid. We need energy decentralization in addition to decarbonization. Renewables like solar and wind are 100% the best step.

    • @gmtom@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      41 year ago

      anyone with a basic understanding of economics?

      Like either we spend fuck tons of money subsidising nuclear to make it profitable or we can focus on wind and companies will build it themselves because its profitable.

      • prole
        link
        fedilink
        English
        61 year ago

        What do you think is more likely: that I don’t understand the basics of how capitalism works? Or maybe that the comment was a criticism of the worship of the “free market,” and considering profit-motive to be the be-all, end-all?