Yeah, I think massive chemical batteries for storing excess electricity to facilitate a contrived green energy market is a bad idea.

  • @Boomkop3@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    511 hours ago

    You’re right, but I think less dense but safer and more sustainable options are the better choice for this

    • @scratchee@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      09 hours ago

      We can all agree on that, Clearly li-ion is a bad choice for static use cases.

      But right now it’s the cheapest option, and it looks likely that will stay true for quite a while unfortunately.

        • @humanspiral@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          13 hours ago

          LIthium Iron Phosphate is cheapest relatively dense battery type. Sodium ion will be if lithium get expensive.

        • @scratchee@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          08 hours ago

          Weirdly it’s not, except maybe gravity batteries where nice reservoirs happen to exist already. It should be but it’s not right now.

          Li-ion has economy of scale right now. I do think molten metal etc will overtake eventually, but they’re currently playing catchup and li-ion has dropped in price so much over time that it’s surprisingly cheap even where it should make no sense.