- cross-posted to:
- crosspost
- cross-posted to:
- crosspost
cross-posted from: https://pixelfed.crimedad.work/p/crimedad/705187000877520551
Is this correct for the updated blade guard on a radial arm saw?
The carriage doesn’t go back far enough for the blade guard to fall down behind the fence. I thought the guard was supposed to keep the carriage in the home position until the user lifts it with the lever on the handle. I’m wondering if I did something wrong. Any RAS users know what I’m talking about?
You must log in or register to comment.
Yeah the SawStop technology is really cool and it’s too bad that it’s held up by patents. In my case, because of budget and physical space constraints, the RAS turned out to be the right choice for me.
I thought they announced they were making the patent public so other companies could make the blade stop mechanisms and hopefully save more lives/body parts
I hadn’t heard that before, but you are correct. However, I don’t think there’s a date when this will actually happen. The statement from SawStop says that it’s “many years away”.
Ah so once the patent has been used to its fullest lol
They did.
Stumpy Nubs has released a video on this topic, which is what I’m mainly pulling from.
Several of SawStop’s patents have expired but there is one still active which is fairly broad in scope and basically gives them right-of-way over any flesh-detecting saw brakes. They sued (or issued a cease and desist, don’t know if it went to court or whatever) Bosch for the line of flesh detecting saws they briefly sold. There is now some proposal for requiring all saws to have flesh-sensing blade brakes in the US, which would basically set the minimum price of a table saw at $1000 or more, and SawStop has “promised” to open their patent if this becomes law. For whatever that’s worth.
It is my understanding that Underwriter’s Labs is where the requirement for any new model of table saw sold after 2008 have a riving knife.
