• CrimeDadOPA
    link
    fedilink
    English
    05 months ago

    The alternatives are the status quo or severely restricting natural gas extraction. I won’t say the latter isn’t doable, especially if we can ramp up nuclear power capacity, but there’s a lot of baggage there. We should welcome a solution that effectively makes natural gas an emissions-free resource.

    • @tal@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      25 months ago

      I won’t say the latter isn’t doable, especially if we can ramp up nuclear power capacity

      We could do both and hedge our bets.

      • CrimeDadOPA
        link
        fedilink
        English
        15 months ago

        Yes. I mean, I don’t think we’re getting anywhere without a war economy build-out of nuclear power capacity regardless.

    • ianovic69
      link
      fedilink
      English
      75 months ago

      I wouldn’t call carbon monoxide a good side product. If the amount created is negligible then great, but are there realistic figures?

      • @Delta_V@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        95 months ago

        Also, its probably safe to assume the producers will lie about how much they’re allowing to leak into the air.

      • CrimeDadOPA
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -15 months ago

        I don’t understand what you mean. As described in the article, the process leaves the CO trapped in the ground.

        • ianovic69
          link
          fedilink
          English
          35 months ago

          Yes, the article says that but I’m not sure how much I believe it. If there’s a decent body of work that draws consensus I would be less sceptical.

            • ianovic69
              link
              fedilink
              English
              15 months ago

              Keeping in mind I have zero knowledge of what you’re telling me about, but these examples don’t include anything about carbon monoxide.

              If the similarities to the other gases are close enough to mean that it can be safely stored using the same techniques, then I’m inclined to feel a lot less worried about the whole thing.

              But I don’t really trust these sectors to act on our behalf, only to make profit line go up. Lying and bribing appears to be part of that, as can be seen all around us these days.

              • CrimeDadOPA
                link
                fedilink
                English
                15 months ago

                I’m unaware of any examples of subterranean carbon monoxide storage. However, underground helium storage has been done successfully for a while. Helium is one of the best gases at leaking because of its small size, which should provide some reassurance as to the storage of larger gases underground.

                I agree that greed and corporate malfeasance are a thing, but it’s kind of a separate problem. The government is either going to enforce environmental regulations and manage our resources properly or it’s not.

                • ianovic69
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  15 months ago

                  Well, that sounds promising at least.

                  If you don’t think those things are very much related, may I suggest reading this post on Lemmy today.

                  The levels of corruption aimed at climate denial and in furthering fossil fuels is frightening.

                  • CrimeDadOPA
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    25 months ago

                    For sure. The fossil fuel industry is absolutely insidious.