• CrimeDadOPA
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -115 days ago

    None of those things are in situ combustion thermal recovery. It may well be that this method isn’t appropriate for the process described in the paper. The paper also suggests RF thermal recovery as an alternative. The process just requires additional heat besides the steam to affect the SMR reaction and get the hydrogen out.

    • @Crashumbc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      515 days ago

      No but they all claim their business practices were safe…

      The water dilutes and carries the toxins away. Until the river catches fire…

      If there’s a mine fire just close up the entrance and it’ll go out. Except it hasn’t for 60+ years.

      Fracking can’t cause earthquakes, except it does and there is evidence the chemicals could actually be getting in ground water… This one is particularly interesting. Considering they claim this process is safe.

      But I doubt you care about facts.

      • CrimeDadOPA
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -114 days ago

        I do care about facts, but relevance and context matter.