- cross-posted to:
- news@lemmy.world
- cross-posted to:
- news@lemmy.world
Let me know when we actually execute monopoly regulations as intended.
They “trust” me.
Dumb fucks.
They “trust” me.
Dumb fucks.
That IS A Smoking Gun yes! But have They CONSIDERED that with Another couple MILLION Dollars in Donations to our Non Corrupt President the Trial can Go Away?
As far as I can tell, the promise of a substantial donation seems all that’s required, that and genuflecting … pro tip, don’t mention the hands.
Just gotta Zuck that felonious toadstool
I have doubts it will get fully prosecuted under this administration. Tech oligarchy have been sucking Trump’s dick since he started his term.
Zuckerfuck being among the worst in the bunch.
I am honestly surprised President dum dum, or the AG hasn’t shut down this investigation yet
There are still “favors” to be done.
Didn’t Musk and Zuck want to literally fight recently? I don’t think they are friends.
It was all a theatre, I’m pretty sure.
:soon:
Meta argued that “the FTC’s case rests almost entirely on emails (many more than a decade old) allegedly expressing competitive concerns” but suggested that this is only “intent” evidence, “without any evidence of anticompetitive effects.”
Not sure I understand the argument. if I write that I’m going to buy another company instead of competing with them, then I go ahead and I do buy that exact company, are they arguing that the two things are not necessarily related?
Yes. The argument is, raise the burden of proof: you are proving what my intent was, and what actions I took, but you should be proving negative market effects. Just because I said it, and I did it, doesn’t mean I succeeded. And if I didn’t there’s no reason to be broken up.
Thanks, I understand better now.
On related note, I wish I had know of the “just because I said it and I did it, didn’t mean I succeeded” line of defense when I was a kid
Hang Zuck
That’s when zucks first android robot model came out