Sure, the spec sheet I’ll look at is a picture of a 2004 Ford ranger and a 2024 Ford ranger, one of which is twice the size of the other while having more limited visibility from the driver’s seat and headlights set above the average height of cars from the 1990s, ensuring bright ass headlights in your mirrors no matter what.
So your own source shows the dimensions increasing every single generation to the point of more than a 20% increase in some dimensions… Are you sure that’s what you want to use to defend your deranged worship of giant, indefensible trucks that have explicitly proven to be larger and less safe than their predecessors?
Stop with your fucking pictures, look at specs sheets, it’s fucking numbers we’re comparing, not feelings.
Sure, the spec sheet I’ll look at is a picture of a 2004 Ford ranger and a 2024 Ford ranger, one of which is twice the size of the other while having more limited visibility from the driver’s seat and headlights set above the average height of cars from the 1990s, ensuring bright ass headlights in your mirrors no matter what.
Numbers don’t lie, I even pulled the numbers to prove you wrong.
The biggest increase is in length, you know why? Crumple zones. Have fun getting in an accident without them.
“Hur durr, a regular cab short bed truck is smaller than a crew cab truck!”
I really don’t care about random numbers you claim to have found that go contrary to reality.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ford_Ranger_(Americas)
There, those random numbers, your can verify them.
So your own source shows the dimensions increasing every single generation to the point of more than a 20% increase in some dimensions… Are you sure that’s what you want to use to defend your deranged worship of giant, indefensible trucks that have explicitly proven to be larger and less safe than their predecessors?