• rusticus@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ll type it for the third time in this thread: But there was no actual comparison.

    And there are 2 more important reasons to table new nuclear plant development.

      • rusticus@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        lol. I’ve said now 4 times this is not about nuclear vs fossil fuels. It’s hilarious the perseveration on this.

        Nuclear is dead. Accept it and move on to fixing the problems with renewables. There are 2 fantastic reasons to avoid nuclear.

        • HoornseBakfiets@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Fossil fuels will always be something to compare to as long as Coal generates electricity, the majority of cars run on petroleum, and housing is warmed by gas

          • rusticus@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            At least in the US the number of applications for nuclear plant construction has dropped 75%.