CrimeDad's Lemmy
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Sine_Fine_Belli@lemmy.world to World News@lemmy.ml · 7 个月前

Nuclear Power Was Once Shunned at Climate Talks. Now, It’s a Rising Star.

www.nytimes.com

external-link
message-square
66
link
fedilink
127
external-link

Nuclear Power Was Once Shunned at Climate Talks. Now, It’s a Rising Star.

www.nytimes.com

Sine_Fine_Belli@lemmy.world to World News@lemmy.ml · 7 个月前
message-square
66
link
fedilink
Growing worldwide energy demand and other factors have shifted the calculus, but hurdles still lie ahead.
  • Diplomjodler@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 个月前

    Those 800 wind turbines can be built in a month. Building a nuclear plant takes decades. And nuclear fuel reprocessing had never been economical by a long shot. Your pipe dreams will always regain just that and that’s before we even start talking about proliferation and nuclear waste.

    • EddoWagt@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      7 个月前

      Building a nuclear plant takes decades.

      In China they do it in 6 years…

      https://www.statista.com/statistics/712841/median-construction-time-for-reactors-since-1981/

      • ByteJunk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 个月前

        And in those 6 years, you could have built over 6x that capacity in renewables, easy.

        • EddoWagt@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          7 个月前

          You can also built more than 1 reactor at the same time

          • 418_im_a_teapot@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 个月前

            The same can be said of any power source?

            • EddoWagt@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              7 个月前

              Sure, but the other commenter conveniently forgot that that’s the case for nuclear as well

          • ByteJunk@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 个月前

            You could, but with that colossal amount of resources you could have built 12x in renewables, probably more because of economy of scale.

            And if you decide to commit all those resources to renewables, you probably just created a booming local industry of well paying jobs.

            • EddoWagt@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              7 个月前

              But then you still haven’t solved any of the issues with renewables (at least solar and wind); The amount of space they take up, their inconsistent power output and power grids which haven’t been designed for them.

              • ByteJunk@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                7 个月前

                It saddens me that we’re here dealing with a push for obsolete, untenable solutions, and all the while, China keeps solving your “impossible issues” on the daily:

                https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20241113-will-chinas-ultra-high-voltage-grid-pay-off-for-renewable-power

                • EddoWagt@feddit.nl
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  7 个月前

                  That’s what happens when not everything is privatised and only made for direct profit, I suppose

      • Diplomjodler@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        7 个月前

        I’m very glad I don’t live anywhere near one of those.

        • EddoWagt@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 个月前

          And why is that?

          • Diplomjodler@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            7 个月前

            The Chinese are really famous for their safety culture, right?

            • EddoWagt@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              7 个月前

              None of their reactors have blown up yet and they’ve had nuclear plants since the 50’s

World News@lemmy.ml

worldnews@lemmy.ml

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !worldnews@lemmy.ml

News from around the world!

Rules:

  • Please only post links to actual news sources, no tabloid sites, etc

  • No NSFW content

  • No hate speech, bigotry, propaganda, etc

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 318 users / day
  • 929 users / week
  • 3.94K users / month
  • 13K users / 6 months
  • 1 local subscriber
  • 36.3K subscribers
  • 13.1K Posts
  • 114K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • Rumblestiltskin@lemmy.ml
  • AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml
  • Jack.@lemmy.ml
  • zephyreks@lemmy.ml
  • OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml
  • BE: 0.19.11
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org