You must log in or register to comment.
I’m just very unoptimistic that this won’t come back as corporate garbage and not remotely resembling what it once was.
The people doing the revival have been working to keep the original pebbles working for years now. I think they’re really passionate about the watch, and that gives me hope for the revival.
It sounds like “the people” is just Migi, unless I’m misunderstanding. The guy who EEE’d Beeper.
How did Migi embrace, extend, and extinguish Beeper‽
Everything is closed source now.
The beeper apps were never open source to begin with, but all the bridges are and will continue being.
The beeper apps were never open source to begin with
Incorrect. They were open source right up until they moved over to the new Beeper app.
I’ve been with them since the first alphas, and no, the mobile and desktop apps, and the server implementation were never open source, only the mautrix and beeper bridges. Nothing has changed with the new apps, and the local bridges (that run in your phone with the app) will also be open sourced on release.
Where did you read that? The github pages are all still open and receiving updates, you can still self-host the bridges and its under the apache-2.0 license, just like it’s always been.
I didn’t read anything I looked it up. The app and the new “Beeper cloud” server are both closed source.
The best part is you can make your own!
With what? I don’t own a watch factory.
Arduino
How are you gonna fit an Arduino in a watch?
Don’t forget the screen and the battery too.
You put an Arduino-compatible microcontroller on a custom PCB, obviously. A QFN package ATTiny is like 4mm square.
It’ll all be SMT parts if you want it to be watch-sized, so you’ll have to let JLCPCB or whoever assemble the board for you instead of soldering it yourself, but it’s surprisingly accessible to random hobbyists these days.
Yeah I don’t understand any of these words.
What part of you just DHRT the CNGIR to the WKFI do you not understand?!?
we’ve got pineWatch so why not pebble? PineWatch is OK but it’s.not pebble. It was an amazing low tech that was actually extremely useful
Interesting to see if it will be better than Bangle JS 2, the spiritual successor to Pebble. That’s the one I’ve been using a few years and I still like it a lot.
Somehow I missed out on this device when searching for open watches, thanks for the info.
Definitely interested in trying this. I’ve got an Android smart watch and I’m really disappointed in the lack of customisation and integration with stuff.
I’m not in to smart watches, but I’m happy this is happening. A couple of friends really liked the pebble and were sad to see it go.
If you click “no” on the website it takes you to the Google pixel watch site. My goodness that thing is ugly.
Which business model are they going for - screwing over their former employees? Or selling access to something that doesn’t belong to them? Or are they going to try to combine them both this time?
The former pebble employees at Google worked hard to get the OS open source, so I think it’s fair to assume they were hoping for this outcome. And the repebble team (who are the ones"bringing it back") have been working on providing support and keeping the original pebble watches going for years now.
I’m confused what you’re asking. Google opens sourced the pebble code, which they acquired from their purchase of Fitbit, who acquired it when they purchased pebble. Repebble is an open source project that has been trying to keep the original pebble watches working since Fitbit shut pebble down.
Loved my pebble watch, got burned with kickstarter campaign for pebble 2 (bid lost money gone when it was cancelled because fibbit taking over right at this moment).
Since then I went back to Casio and will not look at a computer on a wrist anymore, not even Apple Watch or repebble.
I ♥️ my Casio F-91W
deleted by creator
