Linux has made significant strides, and in 2023, it’s better than ever. However, there are still individuals perpetuating a delusion: that desktop Linux is as user-friendly and productive as its mainstream counterparts. After a few discussions on Lemmy, I believe it’s important to provide a clear review of where Linux falls short as a daily driver for average users.

EDIT: can I just make it clear I don’t agree with this article one bit and think it’s an unhinged polemic?

  • vapeloki@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is a reason, but it has nothing to do with alternatives. It would still hold true if you have 8 gimp and one photoshop users

        • BolexForSoup@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Well yeah, we are talking about what causes adoption. You have to incentivize people. Maybe it’s cost. Maybe it’s feature sets. Maybe it’s being FOSS. The point is people don’t change their professional software lightly. Production houses even less so.

    • TCB13@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Wrong: this is the only thing that matters, the rest is wishful thinking and delusions.

      • vapeloki@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        So, if you are in a company that uses Gimp, and you want to use PS, it is still gimp’s fault that this will not work?

        • TCB13@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I guess it depends on how likely that company interacts with external people who use PS. The problem is that PS is the industry’s standard and if you go against it and things break your fault.

          • vapeloki@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Windows is an industry standard. And so is office. As long as we treat it as such. If we want things to change we have to go against such standards.

            The big difference between Office and Photoshop is: Microsoft opened their file format. And has support for open standards.

            Adobe locked their eco system down to build a monopoly. This is not gimps fault. It is 100% on Adobe.

            While the outcome is the same, I would love to see a different wording: nothing is an alternative to Photoshop, because Adobe has a monopoly.

            • TCB13@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Even with an open format MS Office and LibreOffice and others have compatibility issues. Microsoft keeps certain features kind of exclusive to their solution and then there’s the bigger picture called the Microsoft ecosystem. They are now very focused on that and that’s really hard to beat.

              • vapeloki@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                This is true. But in reality, it still works.

                And yes, the expansion of their Ecosystem is an issue. But to be honest: the cloud version works, and if I get a docx that is broken in Libreoffice, I use 365. At least I have this option.

                It’s a complicated topic with no real solution

                • TCB13@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  It’s a complicated topic with no real solution

                  The only real solution was to get something like Wine or some type of virtualization working better. We will never be able to beat Microsoft, their formats and ecosystem the alternatives will always lag behind in features and the web version isn’t feasible for everything and everyone.

                  • vapeloki@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    There is one alternative: anti monopoly legislation. Maybe, some day, if the EU gets their heads out of their asses, throw their privacy braking chat monitor out of the window, and start thinking again. In 30-40 years maybe