• @anarchost@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    2
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Edit: thank you for all the thoughtful replies from the people who downvoted but left an explanation!

    The more I think about this question, the more complexities it creates. I am not a vegan, so I can only guess what the average vegan would think…

    • If you eat a plant that causes harm to a living being like an insect, are you doing a moral good from a vegan perspective because you are reducing harm?
    • Would it be morally good for a vegan to use vegan means to prevent more harm to animals?
    • Would it be the ultimate moral good for vegans to hunt down every wild Venus flytrap and consume them?
    • What if the Venus flytrap only ate insects that significantly harmed animal or human populations by spreading diseases?
    • If vegans could alter the environment using non-vegan means, in such a way that bats stopped eating mosquitoes without upsetting the overall ecosystem, but these mosquitoes started spreading a terrible but non-deadly disease in humans, would it be moral for them to do so, or would it be immoral for them to avoid it?

    Unfortunately, I don’t know the calculus a vegan uses when placing value on the life of a human versus an animal, so the bat mosquito thing is entirely up in the air for me up in the air for me

    • @PM_ME_FAT_ENBIES@lib.lgbt
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Genetically engineering the disease in the saliva of the lone star tick so that it’s sexually transmissible between humans is vegan.

  • @Susaga@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    English
    301 year ago

    I would say yes. Plants feed off of the bodies of dead lions according to this animated documentary I saw, and that doesn’t make them any less vegan. Then again, I’m not a vegan, so I might be entirely wrong.

    • Track_ShovelOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -271 year ago

      But Scavengers feed off dead bodies too. Is Hyena vegan? What about crow?

      • @Susaga@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        English
        151 year ago

        Feeding off of dead bodies isn’t what makes it vegan or not. Plants are plants and animals are not, regardless of their diet.

        Or are you trying to argue that grass isn’t vegan?

        • Track_ShovelOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -41 year ago

          No, more that animals are harmed in the growth of a fly trap.

            • Track_ShovelOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -41 year ago

              Your double negative is throwing me for a loop.

              I also don’t get the jump from industrial Ag and wheat.

              Can you word your point differently?

              • @tofuwabohu@slrpnk.net
                link
                fedilink
                81 year ago

                Wheat is vegan, even if animals are harmed in the process of growing and harvesting it (pesticides, rodents in combine harvesters).

                Venus fly traps are vegan, even if they harmed flies.

                • Track_ShovelOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  -31 year ago

                  What if the meat was harvested in a humane manner? Nitrogen asphyxiation, for instance, which is being trialed for use on humans wishing to commit suicide?

                  I’m not debating the merits current meat harvesting; on an industrial scale it’s abhorrent. I’m just mostly wanting to know where the line is drawn

                  In my case I point out above, the only real differences is that humans have a choice and animals would not (this is a big one, I will grant you) and what is ultimately consumed.

          • @anarchost@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            01 year ago

            Besides being cannibalism, I’m pretty sure all vegans would tell you that humans have sentience greater than, if not on par with, the average animal. So eating one would not be vegan

                • lorez
                  link
                  fedilink
                  11 year ago

                  I’m replying here cos I can’t find the comment you posted: I see humans as worthwhile as any other species but boy do we overrate ourselves. We’re the most important creature, the animal that has to be better than all the rest. We’d go without eating if that were possible. In the end what we do doesn’t matter much. Life keeps on going where it can and the spheres keep turning around.

  • daddyjones
    link
    fedilink
    181 year ago

    I believe there are some vegans who won’t eat figs because they absorb the body of a certain type of wasp. I forget the details, but the point is - it probably depends on the vegan

    • @xantoxis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      91 year ago

      One key detail of that is that the figs contain the bodies of that type of wasp, so you’re technically still eating an animal if you’re not extremely careful.

        • @anarchost@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          51 year ago

          As far as I know, the vegan prerogative is to avoid harming any living creature, and avoiding eating animals comes downstream of that. I think other vegans believe eating any animal for any reason is immoral, but I’m not really sure of their rationale.

          So on the one hand, you might be able to convince a vegan to eat roadkill…

          • @TheButtonJustSpins@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            English
            51 year ago

            There’s some debate over whether bivalves are vegan, because they don’t have a central nervous system and therefore can’t experience suffering.

  • @oddityoverseer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    26
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Vegan here. Interesting question! I think you’re going to get a different answer depending on the vegan you talk to. Personally, this is the definition of veganism I subscribe to:

    “Veganism is a philosophy and way of living which seeks to exclude—as far as is possible and practicable—all forms of exploitation of, and cruelty to, animals for food, clothing or any other purpose; and by extension, promotes the development and use of animal-free alternatives for the benefit of animals, humans and the environment. In dietary terms it denotes the practice of dispensing with all products derived wholly or partly from animals.”

    By that definition, for me, it is not vegan. If the VFT has been grown by humans, and fed insects, then that is non-vegan, because there was a lot of animal suffering that went into growing that VFT. Furthermore, VFTs are not required for sustaining the human body, so the only reason to do this is for human pleasure or something.

    Edit to add: if the VFT was found in nature, I probably still wouldn’t consume it, because 1) I don’t even know if VFTs are edible 2) if they are, I’ve got better food with me that probably caused less animal suffering, and are less morally ambiguous.

    • Track_ShovelOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      81 year ago

      Thanks! A legitimate answer, other than people calling me a moron.

      I’ll admit, this was a ‘is a hotdog a sandwich’ kind of question.m, but I learned something too!

    • They’re also rare, not supposed to harvest, instead you should buy them from people who cultivate them as to not harm the “wild” population.

    • Not trying to sound pedantic or rude, by just generally curious; What about all the other microorganisms, bacteria,etc that are within any given plant you eat line up with this eh, philosophy? I know this may come across as a bit reductionist, but I guess when you see a lot of edge cases, it becomes a sword XD

      Like, how would veganism feel about a person’s immune system killing off other things? Do you avoid hand sanitizer? I guess the crux of my questions boil down to where the line is drawn. Does it only apply to non plant/fungi?

      • @oddityoverseer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        51 year ago

        Those scenarios fall under the “as far as possible and practical” clause. Plants and fungi need insects to pollinate them, and microorganisms for nutrients. Veganism isn’t a death-cult, so we have to eat something. Therefore, those insects and microorganisms are necessary.

        Ditto for immune system and hand sanitizer. They are necessary parts of being human.

        Another common one to ask about is animals killed in the process of farming, such as field mice that are caught in machinery. I also recognize those as necessary in the current system, but I do grow some of my own food as a small way to minimize those things, and I believe that if more people cared, we could eliminate that problem. But it’s not something in my power, so I must classify it under the “as far as possible and practical” clause.

        Another is animals that die as a result of roads. My answer to that one is /c/fuckcars

            • There’s a few ways to interpret that and answer. The why some animals and not others is more of a cultural divide. To my knowledge I’ve never consumed dog meat. I hear it taste…ok. I personally wouldn’t seek it out, and that’s an interesting question in of itself. Would I decline it in a survival situation, no. Would I decline if offered to me while in another country or something? Not sure.

              The odd side effect of farmed animals is insurance of their survival as a species. Now, I’m not anti vegan. I don’t think it’s a bad idea. I’m omnivorous. Could we do better, ya. I’ve helped with the family farm before, growing a variety of produce. I’ve also hunted before. It would be nice to go back to a more primal way of eating. Having to work for the food beyond driving to a grocery store or having them delivered. Most of humanity has lost that connection to the land and life cycle.

      • 🎀 Seryph (She/Her)
        link
        fedilink
        21 year ago

        I mean, reread the definition. Oddity specifically states that animals are the thing to avoid cruelty towards. Bacteria are not animals, therefore they don’t matter under this definition.

        There are some microscopic animals that exist, but they still don’t really contradict the definition because of the “as far as is possible and practicable” clause. You can’t really stop your immune system from working so it’s a moot point. Hand sanitizer doesn’t matter since tmk the actual microscopic animals like tardigrades or roundworms aren’t really affected by it.

      • aname
        link
        fedilink
        41 year ago

        Venus flytrap are plants. Simple as that.

        • Track_ShovelOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -251 year ago

          But they eat animals.

          Fungi are more closely related to animals than plants. Are they vegan?

              • @intensely_human@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                141 year ago

                Specifically it’s about the consent of any sentient beings involved in the production.

                Milk and eggs are fine as long as you’ve acquired them via free market exchange with the animal that produced them. n

                Like, breast milk from a woman is okay for a vegan to eat as long as it wasn’t forcibly taken from her.

                • @jeffw@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  31 year ago

                  Which, to be clear, .00001% of human consumed milk doesn’t involve torturing cows and stealing their babies

              • @jeffw@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                111 year ago

                Is this a joke or are you a moron? We forcibly impregnate cows and steal their children… and then do it over and over again until they die

                I’m not vegan, but do you seriously not get how animal suffering works? Go watch Earthlings or Dominion if you’re curious

            • @anarchost@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              11 year ago

              If you could operate a series of trolley problems regarding sentience for the average vegan, would a somewhat quantifiable hierarchy arise?

              For example, would a vegan save one human over three pigs, or over 100 pigs?

              If a vegan could use vegan means to prevent the death of all mosquitoes without upsetting the ecology of the planet Earth, but the mosquitoes would then start infecting more humans with hazardous but non-deadly diseases, should the vegan attempt those means?

              • @xeddyx@lemmy.nz
                link
                fedilink
                2
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                I can’t speak for other vegans, but as a vegan, I’d pick an animal’s life over a human’s, so your trolly problem is easy for me. Fuck humans, there are over 8 billion of us and we don’t need any more; fewer there are, the better it is for this planet.

          • @Moobythegoldensock@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            621 year ago

            I think you need to look up the definition of of “vegan.” It’s not based on what your food eats: you can’t call eating a grass-fed cow “vegan.”

            Fungi is also not animals.

            • If a plant has to eat animals to survive then that plant is a product of animal suffering. Thats why vegans don’t drink milk or eat eggs too. So if that’s the definition of vegan that someone subscibes to then the flytrap is not Vegan.

              • @rwhitisissle@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                01 year ago

                Vegans also don’t eat honey, which is not really a byproduct of animal suffering. And a vegan also wouldn’t eat eggs, even if they kept and raised their own free range chickens who were laying unfertilized eggs which were just going to rot if not consumed. Because veganism isn’t about the “suffering” of an animal. You could genetically engineer an animal that was incapable of feeling pain or fear and made it so that it felt ecstasy while being butchered, but killing and eating it would still be unethical for a person to do, and still be in violation of veganism’s core principles, because it’s about conscious beings exploiting the labor or nature of animals without their consent. An animal like a wolf or lion (or in this case a venus fly trap) eating meat is not “unethical” because it exists outside of ethics: it’s just a component of an ecosystem in which predation is a natural element. Humans have functionally removed themselves from whatever ecosystem they evolved to be a part of, so our exploitation of animals and their natural behaviors is just that: exploitative.

              • @Moobythegoldensock@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                71 year ago

                That’s not the definition of vegan. The definition of vegan is a person who abstains from animal products. Plants are not animal products.

                Eating a venus flytrap is also removing a plant that eats animals.

                • @agitatedpotato@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  4
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  There are plenty of vegans who would tell you they abstain from any products of animal suffering, otherwise they would use products that were tested on animals. Just because you test lipstick on animals, doesn’t make the lipstick a product of animals, its a product of animal suffering. Your definition is not the only one and doesn’t exclude animal tested products, which many vegans go out of their way to avoid.

          • hallettj
            link
            fedilink
            English
            71 year ago

            Fungi are more closely related to animals than plants.

            I bring this up too. What my kid asks, “what is vegan?”, and my wife says, “someone who eats plants”, then I shout from across the room, “and fungi!” Tbh no one is amused but me.

            There’s nothing hypocritical about eating fungi! I just want recognition for the fungal contribution.

  • fmstrat
    link
    fedilink
    English
    61 year ago

    Is murdering a murderer who plans to murder again murder?

    I imagine there is gray in veganism, as with all philosophical life choices.

    • @intensely_human@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      71 year ago

      I’ve taken some high school algebra so let’s see how I can analyze this.

      • Is murdering a murderer who plans to murder again murder?
      • Is murdering X murder
      • Murdering X = murder
      • Is murder murder?
      • Yes
  • @Floey@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    9
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    If the VFT was grown for human purposes such as eating then no it would not be vegan, as they require a small but steady stream of bugs to grow. Though if you found a feed alternative like a nutrient pill then I guess it could be vegan. As for a VFT found in the wild then yes it would be vegan, anything it has consumed in the past wasn’t done so for your sake.

  • @atrielienz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    101 year ago

    Yes. It’s a plant. Made of plant things. In the same way that plants that are fertilized by dead bodies would also be vegan. You aren’t eating meat. The plant is receiving sustenance from breaking down that organic material but you aren’t.

    • Track_ShovelOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 year ago

      Meat is literally dead bodies, which we derive sustenance from.

      Harvested plants would be considered dead (plant) bodies, so where is the difference?

      The best argument I’ve heard so far is the one around sentience, but that gets confusing too, since plants react to stimuli and grass can signal other plants it’s being eaten.

      • @Lavitz@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        51 year ago

        But the question you asked was about a vegan diet.

        The difference is complex chemical reactions. These complex reactions could be “sentience” but it’s the number of reactions and how they all work together to accomplish goals beyond their singular function.

        Plants perceived communicating is due to adaptation and evolution to protect themselves from predators and fire. They did not develop communication skills like an animal would have to also protect itself. Perception and interaction are not communication.

      • @atrielienz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        31 year ago

        No no. I mean if a plant is nourished by dead animals who have died near them. Or in some places where animal bodies are used in fertilizer.

  • @cosmicrookie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    61 year ago

    In the same way as eating a cow is not considered vegan even though the cow only eats grass, yes eating a plant that eats flies would still be vegan.

  • CrimeDadA
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -101 year ago

    A Venus flytrap cannot consent to being eaten, so no.

  • @PM_ME_FAT_ENBIES@lib.lgbt
    link
    fedilink
    English
    31 year ago

    ITT: people misunderstanding the difference between vegetarianism and veganism

    Here’s the quick version: Vegetarians don’t eat animals. Vegans don’t eat stuff made of animal suffering.

    Fly traps are made of animal suffering.

  • @stolid_agnostic@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    161 year ago

    Yes. They aren’t digesting meat, they are absorbing potassium and fixed nitrogen. The plant cells are, well, plant cells.

      • @sizzler@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        121 year ago

        Nature’s metal. We can’t change that. However for the first time in history you have the opportunity to not eat the only companions we have in the universe.

          • @Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            41 year ago

            I mean, technically all plants are carnivorous. They all depend on soil which is organic matter made from all sorts of post-living organisms plants, bacteria, insects, and animals alike.

            • @agitatedpotato@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              1
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Then some plants would still be more carnivorous than others. When I hear someone talking about how clearing land for food kills lots of animal, the typical response I see is that Vegans know this, but try to avoid animal suffering whenever possible because its simply not always possible. I think that line of reasoning could easily be used to say well why eat a fly trap when theres other plants that don’t cause as much harm to animals. Imagine if everyone started eating flytraps then they would need to be mass farmed, and mass fed, and I’d imagine they’d look a lot less vegan in that situation.

          • @sizzler@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            31 year ago

            If we were involved in the process, say 1m Venus traps in a shed and fed flies bred specifically then that’s not OK. But as its part of a natural plant process then it’s still wierd but OK. I think, who am I to say? The vegan judge?

            • @agitatedpotato@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              3
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Well the point of the post is to nit pick a hypothetical since I doubt many people, much less vegans are actually eating those plants, we’re all casing judgement here. Especially since not everyone definition of veganism is the same. To me if its dietary and chemical then obviously it doesn’t matter, but if the ‘product of animal suffering’ is someones black and white philosophy then to me Flytraps seem about as vegan as consuming the flies they eat (which is only like one month). While an insignificant amount, it is measurable is all I’m saying, literally a technicality but that’s why its a basically hypothetical post online I suppose. In reality, everyone draws their own line somewhere, from the jainists who breath through cheese cloths to protect any microorganisms they can to the carnivours.

        • @emptiestplace@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          51 year ago

          I am in awe. I’ve been vegan for 26 years, but this still caught me off guard. Simple, profound, brilliant. Thank you.