alessandro@lemmy.ca to PC Gaming@lemmy.caEnglish · 11 days agoU.S. investigates whether DeepSeek smuggled Nvidia AI GPUs via Singaporewww.tomshardware.comexternal-linkmessage-square23fedilinkarrow-up174arrow-down17cross-posted to: hardware@lemmy.world
arrow-up167arrow-down1external-linkU.S. investigates whether DeepSeek smuggled Nvidia AI GPUs via Singaporewww.tomshardware.comalessandro@lemmy.ca to PC Gaming@lemmy.caEnglish · 11 days agomessage-square23fedilinkcross-posted to: hardware@lemmy.world
minus-squareSpikesOtherDog@ani.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·11 days agoI get the prevailing idea, and I can understand the reasoning behind it. My question really was trying to ferret out whether it was US laws that were violated, Singaporean laws, the initial trade agreement, or something else.
minus-squareNomecks@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·11 days agoThe seller and buyer both violated US export controls, which is against US law.
minus-squareBCsven@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·9 days agoWhy does China care about US law though?
minus-squareCypher@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·9 days agoThe intermediaries care. This is very obvious.
minus-squareNomecks@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·8 days agoThey don’t, but that wasn’t your question.
I get the prevailing idea, and I can understand the reasoning behind it. My question really was trying to ferret out whether it was US laws that were violated, Singaporean laws, the initial trade agreement, or something else.
The seller and buyer both violated US export controls, which is against US law.
Why does China care about US law though?
The intermediaries care. This is very obvious.
They don’t, but that wasn’t your question.