After creating a fresh installation of Ubuntu 24.04, I installed DEB Firefox from APT by following Mozilla’s instructions from here. But I noticed that it was secretly replaced with Snap Firefox. I was able to verify this by checking the About Firefox page. This is the third time I noticed this.

    • ritchie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      I must have hit that 1% last time. I assembled a new PC, wanted to install debian and could not get a login screen after installation. At that point I wanted something that just works. I installed Xubuntu and had the machine ready right away.

    • beeng@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      I… I… I don’t know why I haven’t done that myself. (Am now on NixOS btw) but for work maybe I ask for Debian cloud box.

      • N.E.P.T.R@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        For work, you could also try Fedora Workstation or Linux Mint Debian Edition. Debian is pretty barebones, but if that isnt a bother then do whatever.

        • fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          It’s not barebones. I use it as my main desktop and barely notice any difference from Ubuntu, it has every package I’ve ever needed. I think that mentality of Debian being “bare” is outdated.

          @beeng@discuss.tchncs.de this is for you, too.

          • N.E.P.T.R@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 day ago

            I had a friend jump ship from Windows and they said that Debian felt barebones. I personally dont have any problem with it, I use it all the time for VMs, server, and I used to main it. I still think it is missing a lot of user-friendly small things that i never noticed on my own because I am very comfortable with Linux.

            • fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 day ago

              They do install less by default, but I’d love to pick their brain to understand what they meant. Oh well ¯_(ツ)_/¯

              • N.E.P.T.R@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 day ago

                Linux just isnt transparent about some things. Beginners most have problems when they use a GUI tool and then have to still edit a file. Like dirt example, adding a new drive using GUI disk utility and then sometime in the future disconnecting the drive and being forced into emergency mode.

                • caseyweederman@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 day ago

                  I’d suggest the KDE flavor of Debian, then. Its settings manager is divine, and its software management platform ties every other package management system in (apt/dpkg for Debian, yum for Redhat, pacman for Arch, plus flatpak, nixpkg, and even snaps if you absolutely must). By default starting in Plasma 6.0.

                  More to @fmstrat’s point, and to suggest a possible cause your friend had that impression: if you install the Minimal flavor of any distro, you’re going to get a minimal experience.

        • beeng@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          I like gnome, but i guess i could look at fedora.

          I would like to stay with apt as package manager so the package names stay the same to what I know, or is yum/dnf/etc gonna use the same for most?