• Random_Character_A
      link
      fedilink
      811 months ago

      “Paradox” is a strong word when you sit on a speck of dust middle of nowhere and can barely see.

      • @linearchaos@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        211 months ago

        There should be life ahead of us and life behind us.

        We can see about 10,000 other solar systems with our naked eyes.

        We can see 217,000 with a pair of binoculars

        5.3 million with a 3-in telescope

        380 million with a 15-in telescope

        I can’t find the number for a 64 node earthwide radio telescope but If we were going to find life it would probably be with that.

        • @InputZero@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          4
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          You’re right, but that’s the ‘paradox’. Given our most pessimistic estimates for the chances of life we should have seen at least something that was a huge give away by now. Maybe better telescopes and observation methods will find them, we can get a spectrum from exoplanets. That’s incredible; but so far all we see with our telescopes is more lifeless space. That doesn’t mean they’re not out there, it means our estimates are wrong. It probably means that we just don’t understand what factors are required to create life very well and advanced life is incredibly rare.

        • Random_Character_A
          link
          fedilink
          111 months ago

          And yet. We wouldn’t see ourselves from Alpha Centari unless there was deliberate directed transmission.

  • originalucifer
    link
    fedilink
    1611 months ago

    billionaires
    for profit access to the internet
    fox news
    the turtle mcconnell
    hospital advertising departments
    religion, any. lets not discriminate

    • federalreverse-old
      link
      fedilink
      2511 months ago

      Could be worse, I guess. I live in a “secular” democracy that essentially collects members fees for the Catholic and Lutheran churches (and only those two!) via the federal income tax.

      • Captain Janeway
        link
        fedilink
        611 months ago

        In Germany, state-recognized churches collect taxes from their members in order to finance their activities as well as wages. Everyone who is a member of an officially recognized religious group automatically gets a percentage of their monthly wage taken from their paycheck. Usually, this amounts to around 9% of income tax — with the exception of Bavaria and Baden-Württemberg, where the church tax amounts to 8%.

        For native Germans, church tax is often automatically collected. Many Germans are baptized at a young age and thereby become members of a particular church, which means they pay taxes to that church when they begin to earn income as an adult.

        If you’re a foreigner moving to Germany, you can declare your affiliation to a church when you register at your local citizen’s office.

        9%? That’s absurd. Is there a way to remove yourself from this?

        • @wgbirne@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          311 months ago

          Just want to clarify: It is 9% of the income tax, not 9% of the income. Still too high, but not as absurd as some people may think after reading this incorrectly. I know some people who thought that it is 9% of the income although they were paying church tax for years…

          • Captain Janeway
            link
            fedilink
            511 months ago

            Honestly I didn’t realize that. That does make it a bit more reasonable but it’s still a lot of the income tax. But the other explanations I’ve read sort of make it make sense. Churches were the original social services for the needy and Germany basically coopted the model into their tax system - rather than tearing down religious hospitals or making them private.

            I get it, but it’s also weird!

        • federalreverse-old
          link
          fedilink
          411 months ago

          Is there a way to remove yourself from this?

          Sure: There is a third box “no confession” next to “Catholic” and “Protestant” on the form. You can check that and those 9% remain with the state instead.

          German secularism has a few more peculiarities. Many charitable organizations e.g. running hospitals or institutions caring for the homeless, elderly, and disabled are in fact religious (Diakonie, Johanniter, Caritas, Stadtmission, …). This has some unfortunate effects: They often hire people of Christian faith only, meaning atheists or adherents of other religions are mostly excluded at these organizations. There have also been cases of a doctor at a Christian-run hospital denying the abortion because of their faith – despite abortion being legal here. However, much of the money these organizations receive is in fact public money, supposedly spent on serving the public. Another wrinkle is that Religious Law is used when it comes to e.g. prosecuting rape cases involving priests etc. Somehow, this separate system of law that doesn’t really seem to work particularly well is accepted by the German state.

    • mommykink
      link
      fedilink
      -2511 months ago

      Taxing religious organizations gives them official representation in government affairs which is just as bad, if not worse.

      • @Fisk400@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        3111 months ago

        Definitely not how that works. All companies are taxed and they don’t get any special representation outside lobbying that they were going to do either way and churches do in fact put a lot of the money they should have payed in taxes into lobbying.

        • themeatbridge
          link
          fedilink
          111 months ago

          You don’t think certain companies get favorable treatment via tax code and lobbying?

        • mommykink
          link
          fedilink
          -311 months ago

          companies don’t get any special representation

          Lmao

          • @mateomaui@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            211 months ago

            To some degree, agreed, but your original assertion is still wrong. Unless you count all the devoutly religious people in Congress, and they already have that representation.

            • themeatbridge
              link
              fedilink
              -211 months ago

              No, but well-connected companies use regulatory capture to structure taxes as a burden on their competition.

              Consider for a moment how churches would be taxed. Maybe they are taxed on their assets. That would disproportionately affect larger churches with valuable real estate holdings, like the Catholic and Mormon churches. Maybe the donations they receive are taxed. That disadvantages newer churches which don’t have corporate investments or endowments. Tax land? Hurt cemeteries. Tax salaries? Favor Quaker meeting houses where there is no specific pastor.

              Look, I don’t think churches should be involved in politics. Any that donate to candidates or endorse a party should lose their tax exempt status, because they are no longer churches. But a blanket removal of all tax exemptions for religious organizations is a threat to religious freedom. It would allow the religious leaders in government to play favorites and pick winners, kind of like they do now already.

              • originalucifer
                link
                fedilink
                111 months ago

                yes, freedom of religion can only exist with in perpetuity tax free landownership

                hahaha

                • themeatbridge
                  link
                  fedilink
                  -111 months ago

                  Is that what I said?

                  Tax code is applied by politicians. Do you really expect Christian Conservatives to fairly tax Muslims and Sikhs and Hindus at the same rates as their own churches? Freedom of Religion cannot exist when political leaders are able to tax competing religions into oblivion.

      • @givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        411 months ago

        Please elaborate…

        Like, do you think McDonald’s as a corporation gets to vote?

        Do you think priests and preachers don’t get to vote now?

      • @kent_eh@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2211 months ago

        Not taxing them hasn’t kept their fingers out of the American government.

        Far from it.

        Hell, the current speaker is trying to convince everyone that the government was always intended to be based on religious dogma.

  • Otter
    link
    fedilink
    English
    56
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    A lot of these are things that we can improve

    Here’s one we can’t: giraffes 🦒

    an old meme:

  • livus
    link
    fedilink
    3611 months ago

    Billionaires and Guinea Worm.

    The good news is we are on the verge of eradicating Guinea Worm.