• CrimeDadA
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Is the plan for Venezuela to keep the oil in the ground after annexation or provide an “unlimited financial guarantee” as well as “sufficient liability insurance” in the event of a spill?

    • sevenapples@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Are you implying that Exxon controlling the oil is good because they provide financial guarantees and insurance?

      Edit: I read the article and Exxon doesn’t provide those either, so you’re asking if Venezuela will be a better proprietor. Given that their oil industry is nationalized, probably yes.

      • CrimeDadA
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Maybe there’s an argument that the Exxon deal was so bad that annexation was the only way to avert it, but as far as I can tell, the Venezuelan government is doing on a nationalist basis. Hopefully, it amounts to a better situation for the denizens of Essequibo.

    • Soviet Snake@lemmygrad.mlM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Regardless of that, Esequibo is Venezuela’s, it is their legitimate land, they can do whatever the fuck they want with the oil