𒉀TheGuyTM3𒉁@lemmy.ml to Asklemmy@lemmy.mlEnglish · 2 days agoWhy would'nt this work?lemmy.mlexternal-linkmessage-square221fedilinkarrow-up1534arrow-down131file-text
arrow-up1503arrow-down1external-linkWhy would'nt this work?lemmy.ml𒉀TheGuyTM3𒉁@lemmy.ml to Asklemmy@lemmy.mlEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square221fedilinkfile-text
It can look dumb, but I always had this question as a kid, what physical principles would prevent this?
minus-squareKorhaka@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up57arrow-down1·1 day agoIf your stick is unbreakable and unavoidable you have already broken laws of physics anyway
minus-squareDasKapitalist@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up14·22 hours ago If your stick is unbreakable and unavoidable you have already broken laws of physics anyway You have it backwards: if your stick is unavoidable, NOT HAVING IT is the impossible thing.
minus-squareKorhaka@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·18 hours agoAutocorrected from unfoldable. This is what I get for occasionally browsing on a shitty Amazon tablet. At least it was cheap to the point of being almost free.
minus-squareGnuLinuxDude@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up0·12 hours agoIn carrot vs stick terms, this is the most unfortunate fellow: he who can’t avoid the stick.
If your stick is unbreakable and unavoidable you have already broken laws of physics anyway
You have it backwards: if your stick is unavoidable, NOT HAVING IT is the impossible thing.
Autocorrected from unfoldable. This is what I get for occasionally browsing on a shitty Amazon tablet. At least it was cheap to the point of being almost free.
In carrot vs stick terms, this is the most unfortunate fellow: he who can’t avoid the stick.