• Chozo@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    If you paste plaintext passwords into ChatGPT, the problem is not ChatGPT; the problem is you.

  • NedRyerson@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Who knew everyone had the same password as me? I always thought I was the only ‘hunter2’ out there!

  • lowleveldata@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    ChatGPT doesn’t leak passwords. Chat history is leaking which one of those happens to contain a plain text password. What’s up with the current trend of saying AI did this and that while the AI really didn’t?

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      People are far too willing to believe AI can do anything. How would the AI even have the passwords.

  • Ganbat@lemmyonline.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    They weren’t there when I used ChatGPT just last night (I’m a pretty heavy user). No queries were made—they just appeared in my history, and most certainly aren’t from me (and I don’t think they’re from the same user either).

    This sounds more like a huge fuckup with the site, not the AI itself.

    Edit: A depressing amount of people commenting here obviously didn’t read the article…

    • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      To be fair the article headline is a straight up lie. OpenAI leaked it by sending a user someone else’s chat history, ChatGPT didn’t leak anything.

      • GamingChairModel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The ChatGPT service leaked the data. Maybe that can be attributed to the OpenAI organization that owns and operates ChatGPT, too, but it’s not “a straight up lie” to say that ChatGPT leaked information, when ChatGPT is the name of both the service and the LLM that powers the interesting part of that service.

  • webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    So what actually happened seems to be this.

    • a user was exposed to another users conversation.

    thats a big ooof and really shouldn’t happen

    • the conversations that where exposed contained sensitive userinformation

    unresponsible user error, everyone and their mom should know better by now

    • ZzyzxRoad@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Why is it that whenever a corporation loses or otherwise leaks sensitive user data that was their responsibility to keep private, all of Lemmy comes out to comment about how it’s the users who are idiots?

      Except it’s never just about that. Every comment has to make it known that they would never allow that to happen to them because they’re super smart. It’s honestly one of the most self-righteous, tone deaf takes I see on here.

      • Ookami38@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Data loss or leaks may not be the end user’s fault, but it is their responsibility. Yes, open AI should have had shit in place for this to never have happened. Unfortunately, you, I, and the users whose passwords were leaked have no way of knowing what kinds of safeguards on my data they have in place.

        The only point of access to my information that I can control completely is what I do with it. If someone says “hey, don’t do that with your password” they’re saying it’s a potential safety issue. You’re putting control of your account in the hands of some entity you don’t know. If it’s revealed, well, it’s THEIR fault, but you also goofed and should take responsibility for it.

      • summerof69@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t support calling people idiots, but here’s that: we can’t control whether corporations leak our data or not, but we can control whether we share our password with ChatGPT or not.

      • stoly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Because people who come to Lemmy tend to be more technical and better on questions of security than the average population. For most people around here, much of this is obvious and we’re all tired of hearing this story over and over while the public learns nothing.

        • HelloHotel@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Your frustration is valid. Also calling people stupid is an easy mistake that a lot of prople make, its easy to do.

          • stoly@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Well I’d never use the term to describe a person–it’s unnecessarily loaded. Ignorant, naive, etc might be better.

  • Fades@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Why the fuck would you give any AI your password??? People are so goddamn stupid

  • HiramFromTheChi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    It also literally says to not input sensitive data…

    This is one of the first things I flagged regarding LLMs, and later on they added the warning. But if people don’t care and are still gonna feed the machine everything regardless, then that’s a human problem.

      • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        People literally do this though. I work in IT and people have literally said, out loud, with people around that can hear what we’re saying clearly, this exact thing.

        I’m like… I don’t want your password. I never want your password. I barely know what my password is. I use a password manager.

        IT should never need your password. Your boss and work shouldn’t need it. I can log in as you without it most of the time. I don’t, because I couldn’t give any less of a fuck what the hell you’re doing, but I can if I need to…

        If your IT person knows what they’re doing, most of the time for routine stuff, you shouldn’t really see them working, things just get fixed.

        Gah.

        • Wogi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Lmao my IT guy asks for our passwords to certain things on an annual basis, stores them as plain text in a fucking email.

          First Time he did it I was like “uhh, not supposed to share that?” And he just insisted he needed it. Whatever, he wants to log in to my Autodesk account he’s free to. Not sure how much damage he could do.

          • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            That’s the problem, right there.

            Companies either don’t allow for IT oversight of accounts or charge more for accounts that can be overseen. Companies don’t want to pay the extra, if that’s even an option on the platform, so some passwords end up being fairly common knowledge among the IT staff.

            As for your computer login? No thanks. Microsoft has been built pretty much from the ground up to be administratable. I can get into your files, check what you’re running, extract data, modify your settings, adjust just about anything I want if I know what I’m doing. All without you realizing that I’ve done anything.

            Companies like Autodesk really don’t have that kind of oversight available for accounts that they’re willing to provide to an administrator that’s managing your access. I should be able to list the license that you’ve been given, download whatever software that license is associated to, and purchase/apply new licensing, all from a central control panel for the company under my own administrative user account for their site, whether I’m assigned any software/licensing or not. They don’t. It makes my job very complicated when that’s the case.

            In the event you brick your computer (or lose it, or destroy it, or something… Whether intentional or not), I sometimes need your password to go download your software and install it, then apply your license to it, so that it’s ready to go when you get your system back. You might lose any customizations, but you’ll at least have the tools to do the job.

            On the flip side, an example of good access is with Microsoft 365. You’re having a problem finding an email, I can trace the message in the control panel, get it’s unique ID, set your mailbox to provide myself full access to see it, then switch mailboxes to yours, while I’m still signed in as myself, find the message you accidentally moved into the draft messages folder and move it back to your inbox. Then remove my access and the message just appears in your inbox without you doing anything. I didn’t need to talk to you, I didn’t need your password… Nothing. No interaction, just fixed.

            There’s hundreds of examples of both good and bad administrative access, and it varies dramatically depending on the software vendor. In a perfect world I would have tools like what I get from exchange online for all the software and tools you use. Fact is, most companies are just too lazy to do it, instead of paying the developers to do things well, they’d rather give the money to their shareholders and let us IT folks suffer. They don’t give a shit about us.

          • SparrowRanjitScaur@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            No need for personal attacks. Since you won’t define it I will:

            The ability to acquire and apply knowledge and skills (from Oxford Languages)

            I would argue this applies to ChatGPT. ChatGPT exists under the hood as a neutral network, and is clearly capable of acquiring knowledge during training. And ChatGPT is also clearly capable of applying that knowledge in producing answers to questions or novel solutions to problems.

            Based on this definition, I would argue that ChatGPT is intelligent. Whether ChatGPT is sentient or not is a very different question. I would argue not, but again, that depends on the definition of sentience.

            • doctorcrimson@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              Hey bud I’ve got a hint for you to take, behold the list of people who wanted to have this conversation with your stupid socially inept ass:

    • DreamButt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Back in the RuneScape days people would do dumb password scams. My buddy was introducing me to the game. We were sitting in his parents garage and he was playing and showing me his high lvl guy. Anyway, he walks around the trading area and someone says something like “omg you can’t type your password backwards *****”. In total disbelief he tries it out. Instantly freaks out, logs out to reset his password, and fails due to to the password already being changed

      • andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s golden. With all my hatred towards scammers, there’s a little niche for scams that make people feel smart before undressing them that I can’t bring myself to judge.

    • Xyphius@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      you can go hunter2 my hunter2-ing hunter2.

      haha, does that look funny to you?

    • cm0002@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      You could just watch what you input into it lol ChatGPT is a pretty good tool to have in the toolkit and like any tool there’s warnings and cautions on its use.

      • BananaOnionJuice@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I finally found some offline ones jan.ai and koboldcpp you download the GGUF model and run everything from your own pc, it just takes a lot of CPU and GPU for it to work acceptable, my setup can’t really manage much more than a model with 7B.

    • HelloHotel@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      I absolutely agree. Use somthing like ollama. do keep in mind that it takes a lot of compiting resources to run these models. About 5GB ram and about 3GB filesize for the smaller sized ollama-unsensored.

      • LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s not great, but an old GTX GPU can be had cheaply if you look around refurb, as long as there is a warranty, you’re gold. Stick it into a 10 year old Xeon workstation off eBay, you can have a machine with 8 cores, 32GB RAM and a solid GPU cheaply under $200 easily.

        • HelloHotel@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Its the RAM requirement that stings rn, I beleave ive got the specs but was told or misremember a 64 GB ram requirement for a model.

          • LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            IDK what you’ve read, but I have 24GB and can use Dreambooth and fine-tune Mistral no problem. RAM is only required to load the model briefly before it’s passed to VRAM iirc, and that’s the main deal, you need 8GB VRAM as an absolute minimum, even my 24GB VRAM is often not enough for some high end stuff.

            Plus RAM is actually really cheap compared to a GPU. Remember it doesn’t have to be super fancy RAM either, DDR3 is fine if you’re not gaming on a like a Ryzen or something modern