octopus_ink@lemmy.ml to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agoFacepalm on multiple levelsmessage-squaremessage-square137fedilinkarrow-up1961arrow-down112
arrow-up1949arrow-down1message-squareFacepalm on multiple levelsoctopus_ink@lemmy.ml to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square137fedilink
minus-squareoctopus_ink@lemmy.mlOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up29arrow-down1·2 months agoI think you are bold to assume their plan involved repealing vs ignoring.
minus-squareCyrus Draegur@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up29arrow-down1·2 months agoExactly. “they can’t do that that’s illegal” Who’s gonna stop them? The law ain’t doing Jack FUCKING Shit. If there is no group or individual who is both willing and able to inflict consequences, THERE ARE NO CONSEQUENCES
I think you are bold to assume their plan involved repealing vs ignoring.
Exactly.
“they can’t do that that’s illegal”
Who’s gonna stop them? The law ain’t doing Jack FUCKING Shit. If there is no group or individual who is both willing and able to inflict consequences, THERE ARE NO CONSEQUENCES