• Gladaed@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    The issue is that you cannot tell if the tooling used Gen AI. I.e. the developer used Gen AI to respond to some e mail or as a rubber duck.

    • zalgotext@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 hours ago

      That’s the point of the AI disclosure though, to inform customers that your game contains AI generated content. And the amount of games containing AI generated content is incomparable to the amount of foods containing carbon (ie, all of them).

      Also, if a developer uses AI to “respond to some email”, by my reading of Steam’s rules governing AI disclosures, they wouldn’t need to disclose that. So I’m not sure why you’re bringing that up.

    • FauxLiving@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Exactly.

      People are focused on art because its easy to meme on and playing ‘spot the AI’ makes people feel like they’re discerning individuals with refined tastes. Short clips of generated music is 100% indistinguishable from human-made. Code is invisible to the average user.

      AI-based tools have already been rapidly adopted in industries that experience heavy competition, like game development. Essentially all professional tools include either integrated generation or support for using generative models. Coding is no exception.

      It isn’t the case that “AI will soon be used by developers unless we stop them”. We’re living in the “AI is being used and only rarely spotted” age now.