misk@sopuli.xyz to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agoFramework’s first desktop is a strange—but unique—mini ITX gaming PCarstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square283fedilinkarrow-up1645arrow-down110
arrow-up1635arrow-down1external-linkFramework’s first desktop is a strange—but unique—mini ITX gaming PCarstechnica.commisk@sopuli.xyz to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square283fedilink
minus-squaregravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·2 months agoWell, more specifically: why didn’t they try to go for LPCAMM?
minus-squaregrue@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 months agoFrom what I understand, they did try, but AMD couldn’t get it to work because of signal integrity issues.
minus-squareenumerator4829@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 months agoBecause you’d get like half the memory bandwidth to a product where performance is most likely bandwidth limited. Signal integrity is a bitch.
minus-squaregravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 months agoI thought LPCAMM was designed specifically to address the bandwidth and connectivity issues that crop up around high-bandwidth + low-voltage RAM?
Well, more specifically: why didn’t they try to go for LPCAMM?
From what I understand, they did try, but AMD couldn’t get it to work because of signal integrity issues.
Because you’d get like half the memory bandwidth to a product where performance is most likely bandwidth limited. Signal integrity is a bitch.
I thought LPCAMM was designed specifically to address the bandwidth and connectivity issues that crop up around high-bandwidth + low-voltage RAM?