Using firefox but concerned now

Read about some alternatives:

Edit 2/28: It seems there is no general consensus if we should switch and/or to what.

  • potentiallynotfelix@lemmy.fish
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    I use firefox and am actively looking to change to something, potentially librewolf.

    Edit: just installed librewolf. it’s super clean and I’m glad I got it. replaced firefox almost instantly.

      • kixik@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Have you tried enabling webgl, which by default is disable on Librewolf? You can do that by overwriting the corresponding setting, as it can be done for any Librewolf setting, in particular the webgl override needed is:

        defaultPref("webgl.disabled", false);
        

        If you do, Librewolf recommend using the extension “CanvasBlocker” given the fingerprinting allowed by webgl. There’s a settings doc BTW…

  • bubbalouie@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Firefox because I don’t fuck around. ublock origin, betterfox, and nextdns. My config ensures there is that one site I need to use ungoogled-chromium for, once a month.

  • zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    I use FireDragon, because it’s the only browser I could find that has a vertical tab-bar that collapses. Supposedly Zen does it, too, but I couldn’t get it to work.

    FireDragon also has a toolbar to the side with a notepad and other neat stuff. I haven’t used that yet, but it could be cool.

  • Patrik@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Fennec on mobile, haven’t gotten around to replacing FF on Desktop yet.

  • InvisibleRasta@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Waterfox is based on esr, so quite outdated. Just use librewolf and some css. You have firefox-one that will make it look pretty and similar to zen. Zen is no good if you care about privacy.

      • InvisibleRasta@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        It doesn’t have good privacy defaults and is easily fingerprintable with all the mods and tweaks it has… You will have to use a user.js at least but it will probably not get as good as mullvad or librewolf

  • Xed@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I used to use variations of Firefox but I got tired of websites not being compatible so sometimes I use chrome 🤷

  • SirMaxvelluxSir@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Safari, because I don’t care about which specific browser I should use, neither wasting my time lookin for alternatives, but zen and brave really caught my eyes these days

  • Xanza@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I’ve been using Zen for the past couple days and it’s absolutely spectacular. I really really been enjoying it.

    It claims to be a fork of Firefox but there’s still Firefox under the hood and you can tell. But I find that it runs significantly faster than Firefox standard. So who knows. The author seems to be making it as ambiguous as possible so I would think that it’s a soft fork that’s basically stock Firefox with a few minor changes and a new look.

  • pfr@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    The Gnome browser (epiphany?) is actually quite good. But when I’m on windows I use Zen. On GrapheneOS I use IronFox.

    I also recently tested Ladybird. It’s still not usable for daily use, but I’m excited for it.

  • foremanguy@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Mullvad browser, simply I used to used hardened Firefox but a pre-hardened one is so much more efficient

  • hubobes@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Firefox, while I dislike their new FAQ and TOS I build it from source and the TOS does not apply.

    I wish they would make Firefox Sync a self hostable product that they also host for you for like 5 bucks a month. I would pay for it (or any other way to directly give money to FX instead of Mozilla) like I do for Bitwarden.

      • hubobes@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Yes, but I actually would pay them for their services if they guarantee me that they will use that money to improve Firefox and Firefox services. I want to be a premium user of Firefox, but instead of trying to monetize their core userbase they annihilate them.

        I actually like their advertising business idea and their other services and I understand that they need money but is whay they are doing right now really the best way?