petsoi@discuss.tchncs.de to Linux@lemmy.ml · 11 months agoLinux Mobile Distro postmarketOS Adopts systemd to Better Support GNOME, KDE Plasma9to5linux.comexternal-linkmessage-square38fedilinkarrow-up1359arrow-down19
arrow-up1350arrow-down1external-linkLinux Mobile Distro postmarketOS Adopts systemd to Better Support GNOME, KDE Plasma9to5linux.competsoi@discuss.tchncs.de to Linux@lemmy.ml · 11 months agomessage-square38fedilink
minus-squarePossibly linux@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9arrow-down1·11 months agoAnother init will be slower and will require much more time and resources though.
minus-squareGolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down2·edit-23 months agodeleted by creator
minus-squarexcjs@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up6arrow-down1·edit-211 months agoSystemd was created to allow parallel initialization, which other init systems lacked. If you want proof that one processor core is slower than one + n, you don’t need to compare init systems to do that.
minus-squareGolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·edit-23 months agodeleted by creator
minus-squarexcjs@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·11 months agoI mean, sysvinit was just a bunch of root-executed bash scripts. I’m not sure if systemd is really much worse.
Another init will be slower and will require much more time and resources though.
deleted by creator
Systemd was created to allow parallel initialization, which other init systems lacked. If you want proof that one processor core is slower than one + n, you don’t need to compare init systems to do that.
deleted by creator
I mean, sysvinit was just a bunch of root-executed bash scripts. I’m not sure if systemd is really much worse.