• papayas@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    No US non profits please. Case examples of selling out: chatgpt, Firefox. Even if we consider the country it’s based and it’s European look at the PEOPLE, their history of selling prev companies and to who? And their ethics who they do business with and if they stick to their word

    • AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 days ago

      They’re so entrenched in OS/2, it came as a complete surprise to me as well.

      What happened to all the “Your games will run fine in OS/2”, “it feels just like windows”?

      • neidu3@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        I actually saw a pretty good YouTube recently about what happened to OS/2. In short IBM treated the OS as an afterthought, and didn’t really invest in marketing. The OS/2 team did a spectacular job with what they were given, but the corporate umbrella didn’t really care, so the market all went the win95 route instead.

        I tried OS/2 v3 in the 90’s and it was actually pretty decent.

        EDIT: I think this was the one.

        • AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          5 days ago

          I had it as a secondary system and it certainly was quite good.

          Its compatibility with dos and windows was also quite good. And technically, it was way beyond what Microsoft had. It should have dominated the market.

    • ᗪᗩᗰᑎ@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      While Signal’s home base is the US, they are a non profit org that doesn’t operate in the same way as for-profit corporations. Also, Signal collects basically zero data so there’s no incentive to sell out, and who would want to buy them anyway when they have no data and the server and client are open source.

      Matrix is great, but I wouldn’t compare it to Signal. I use both for very different purposes.

      • papayas@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Chatgpt used to be a non profit. Now it’s almost half Microsoft owned. Sneaky! T&cs can change too (e.g. Firefox selling out google funds them a bit now apparently? ). Don’t give up just find European fully alternatives.

      • XM34@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        Agree with the sentiment against signal. However, Matrix is terrible for anyone who doesn’t want to bother with reading up on several hours of information just to use a text messenger. I will start recommending Matrix the moment someone actually manages to produce a feature complete client with usable UI/UX.

        • lostbit@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 days ago

          yeah been trying out matrix. Setup a server and tried various clients. They are all shit.

      • Fonzie!@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        XMPP is more comparable to Signal, yes.

        Signal does need (yes, need) a phone number, and most people only have one so that is identifiable info.

        This puts it at mostly the same level as some competitors, including WhatsApp which is often advised against.

        • ᗪᗩᗰᑎ@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 hours ago

          XMPP is more comparable to Signal, yes.

          XMPP allows unencrypted messages and leaks metadata - Signal does neither.

          Signal does need (yes, need) a phone number, and most people only have one so that is identifiable info.

          Signal is basically a privacy enhanced text/SMS/phone replacement. I can give my phone to someone in person and they can immediately start “texting” me on Signal - this is a feature (as well as a con to some people).

          This puts it at mostly the same level as some competitors, including WhatsApp which is often advised against.

          People advise against Whatsapp because while it uses Signal to encrypt message contents, they take no effort to minimize the collection of metadata - Signal’s been compelled by court to present all data it has on its users various times and the only info they have is the day/time you signed up for their services and the last day (not time) one of your clients pinged their servers - Source: https://signal.org/bigbrother/

          I have yet to find any other free service that collects this little information and works just as well as a normal non-encrypted messenger. Even Signals sticker packs are end-to-end encrypted - Source: https://signal.org/blog/make-privacy-stick/

          • Fonzie!@ttrpg.network
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 hours ago

            What metadata does XMPP leak? AFAIK only when a message was sent, roughly (in large increments) how large the message was, the server of the sender knows from who to which server, the server of the recipient knows from which server to who.
            I find it strange that Signal somehow doesn’t know when a message was sent, and from who to who; how would they ever make this possible?

            Also, you say you have yet to find any other free service that collects as little data… How about most e-mail providers? Not Google and Microsoft of course, but most e-mail providers only need a name which can be made up as well. You hm also host your own email server, then you are in control. All of this is true for XMPP and Matrix, as well.

      • thyristor@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        Português
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        Signal will operate until Elon Musk decides that everyone has to use X to communicate.

      • Fonzie!@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 days ago

        This? https://https/://simplex.chat/

        FWIW Matrix and XMPP are also decentralised, much like e-mail is, which is why I recommended it. I’m immediately skeptic about SimpleX’s premise of having no user IDs; they’ll likely need some unique field for each user, this might as well be a UUID or something like that… So what’s the benefit?

        • Blastboom Strice@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          6 days ago

          Since it’s related, here’s a good comparison:

          https://eylenburg.github.io/im_comparison.htm

          I think the other person here explained the thing about user ids. Matrix and xmpp are good too, they’re just different.

          Simplex is more of a messenger, while xmpp/matrix are more of discord alternatives.

          Also simplex works with nodes. I can host a simplex server and it will be added to the network. In matrix/xmpp if I host a server it will be a new instance, like in lemmy (if I get it right). Simplex’s approach is like tor’s approach, each server added contributes to the whole network (they arent a separate instance).

          If you check their page they have some bery good features, to me it seems like its signal, done (somewhat) right. Signal doesnt even have a proper way to migrate accounts across devices… not to mention the phone number requirement which might scare people who aren’t gonna waste time hearing my explanation as to why it’s not an issue or the fact that until recently signal would notify everyone in your contacts who had a signal account that you made an account, bruh

          There’s also this comment here that throws some shade to matrix, havent looked much into that tho.

        • something_random_tho@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          6 days ago

          Each convo gets its own UUID, and the convos can be spread across different servers/companies too.

          That said the notifications don’t work consistently for me on iOS, so that’s a dealbreaker. Hopefully they fix that soon.

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    5 days ago

    Isn’t signal owned by a single company with backend infrastructure all Managed by them and only them?

    The current CEO is nice, for sure, but she won’t be there forever. Look at what Mozilla just did, this eventually WILL happen to signal too

    What alternatives are there form something like signal?

    • WolfLink@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 days ago

      You can self-host Signal, although you’d need your friends to sign up with your server.

      What we really need is a federated messaging platform. I don’t think it’s been done yet, but encrypted email efforts are kinda in that direction.

    • pumpkinseedoil@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      Last spring Mistral (free tier) was better for my usage (mainly JS programming) than ChatGPT (free tier). No idea which is better now (esp. after openai launched chatgpt 4, but Mistral improved too) but at least Mistral isn’t bad at all.

      I don’t think I have to elaborate on Linux > Windows. If that’s really needed ask for it please. Summary: It’s simply better, the times where it was only for nerds are long gone.

      Search engine doesn’t matter too much. I usually use DuckDuckGo and it works fine (does what a search engine should do without displaying ads, unlike Google).

      Signal over WhatsApp also is pretty obvious, but it’s the hardest one to change because so many people simply don’t want to switch once one thing is running and you want to communicate with those people.

      LibreWolf basically is Firefox (which is far better than Chrome in terms of privacy, ad blocking, customisability, …)

  • lime!@feddit.nu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    librewolf is still dependent on firefox for development, just like vivaldi is on chrome. there is no european web browser.

  • FundMECFS@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    6 days ago

    Startpage? (based in Netherlands). I mean it’s a frontend for google, but ecosia is a frontend for bing. And startpage has a no log policy which beats ecosia.

  • Thunder03@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 days ago

    As an american I am switching to European apps I am disgusted with being an american citizen and if I could I would move.

  • aldfin@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    6 days ago

    Already done most of those, whatsapp is the hardest to replace for me from this category.

    • Wahots@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      Whatsapp/Facebook is probably one of the biggest offenders. They’re one of the ones that got us into this mess.

  • pigup@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    You can run very powerful llm locally, albeit slowly if you lack GPU power.

    Check out Dolphin models you can run on LM Studio