• Fubarberry@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      I’m not surprised that a for-profit company for wanting to avoid bad press by censoring stuff like that. There’s no profit in sharing that info, and any media attention over it would be negative.

    • General_Effort@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      They use the bomb-making example but mostly “unsafe” or even “harmful” means erotica. It’s really anything, anyone, anywhere would want to censor, ban, or remove from libraries. Sometimes I marvel that the freedom of the (printing) press ever became a thing. Better nip this in the butt, before anyone gets the idea that genAI might be a modern equivalent to the press.