Lanky_Pomegranate530@midwest.socialM to Religious Cringe@midwest.social · 1 day agoThis guy is clearly not right in the headmidwest.socialexternal-linkmessage-square89fedilinkarrow-up1241arrow-down110
arrow-up1231arrow-down1external-linkThis guy is clearly not right in the headmidwest.socialLanky_Pomegranate530@midwest.socialM to Religious Cringe@midwest.social · 1 day agomessage-square89fedilink
minus-square/home/pineapplelover@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up19·14 hours agoSo the logic is that, whoever speaks first is the one who has to prove it? In that case we can go back to the earliest time these guys ever came up that there was this single deity named God. They never proved him back then, never did so now.
minus-squaremelpomenesclevage@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·6 hours agono but see that was olden times so it doesn’t count, only now once it’s an established assumption does this rule go into effect and count. unless I think of a new thing I want you to believe. then it has a teensy weensy time-out while I say that, then it’s back in effect again.
So the logic is that, whoever speaks first is the one who has to prove it? In that case we can go back to the earliest time these guys ever came up that there was this single deity named God. They never proved him back then, never did so now.
no but see that was olden times so it doesn’t count, only now once it’s an established assumption does this rule go into effect and count.
unless I think of a new thing I want you to believe. then it has a teensy weensy time-out while I say that, then it’s back in effect again.