• BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    23 days ago

    Jokes aside, nothing wrong with rewriting in Java. It is well-suited for this kind of thing.

    Rewriting it in anything without fully understanding the original code (the fact they think 150yo are collecting benefits tells me they don’t) is the biggest mistake here. I own codebases much smaller than the SSA code and there are still things I don’t fully understand about it AND I’ve caused outages because of it.

    • digipheonix@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      23 days ago

      No. Java is not suited for this. This code runs on mainframes not some x86 shitbox cluster of dell blades. They literally could not purchase the hardware needed to switch to java in the timeline given. I get what you’re trying to say but in this case Java is a hard no.

      • Glitchvid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        23 days ago

        Uh, Java is specifically supported by IBM in the Power and Z ISA, and they have both their own distribution, and guides for writing Java programs for mainframes in particular.

        This shouldn’t be a surprise, because after Cobol, Java is the most enterprise language that has ever enterprised.