And this is why media bias fact check is a dogshit organization
… Because we sont like facts?
Because they aren’t good at doing their job
Could it be that “The Jerusalem Post” is not exactly a fair and unbiased source for this kind of news? Could they be more something like a propaganda outlet?
Well no, they are unbiased and fair. MBFC told me so.
You have to understand this is not a “blogging site”. It uses HTML and CSS and has a high credibility score on MBFC.
You have to understand this is not a “blogging site”.
Which makes The Jerusalem Post a “real news organization” and allowed, unlike Zeteo. (At least, that’s the logic of the WorldNews mods)
OK, so even taking it at face value - is this a tacit admission that more than 1-in-4 of Palestinians killed by the IDF were women, children and the elderly?
If the article is correct, it says the reporting from Hamas itself has revised it’s numbers to remove a lot of women and children (leaving the ‘combat-aged men’ which is why that weird phrase) from the casualty reporting.
I don’t know if that’s true or false, I’m just saying the org in question is pointing to Hamas’ own reporting, not saying they did their own.
Hamas has not revised their numbers.
Can you link to the 'Hamas source" this American org is supposedly citing? Your comment looks like a heap of misinformation.
Hamas lying? No, never /s
Hamas is lying all the time. This does not mean the other side is telling the truth.
Salo Aizenberg is an investment banker with an office in White Plains, NY. He is not in any way a good source for what is happening on a different continent especially when determining who and who is not in Hamas is not in his skill sets.
Hamas did not say it.
A pro-Israel guy in New York said that Hamas said it.
That is enough for this very credibly newspaper to publish it as a “Hamas admission” in their headline.
so true if that gazan didn’t want to die he shouldn’t have been male and 14
