BlitzFitz

This is how any company reacts to any viral reaction to any topic. Companies do not want to be associated with any controversy whatsoever. Easier to just fire the person and move on.

Not saying this is right, but a viral anti or pro Nazi, pro or anti whatever post that your company catches wind of will get you fired.

I mean this is a good idea, but the opposite of the question stated. Are there no think tanks to implement liberal solutions as opposed to stopping or fixing conservatives policies.

Why can’t we scheme as well as conservatives?

There is also a step of washing your decarbed cannabis before soaking in butter or alcohol to absorb the THC.

Worked well when we used abv. Really removed the burnt and leafy taste out.

Pretty much just soak your decarb until it doesn’t smell, with multiple washes. THC doesn’t absorb into water. So won’t weaken your batch.

Ai llms have learned from us. Good and bad. It doesn’t know the difference between good and bad unless you tell it.

So you have to know what’s good or bad from the get go before using it and trusting it yet.

And some blindly trust ai already… Which its far from that level of trust

“until something works" At least you’re doing a better job than some people.

Some leave it at will ai told me so. And they don’t know better and put that into prod!

Godspeed to all the brain dead idiots who will sign up for this, and will become even more literally brain dead after getting the implant.

I didn’t know this was how adblockers and sites worked in general.

If the html file is on the users device and they overwrite it, via an ad blocker, that is in their rights as the property owner of the machine.

Seems like sites need to get creative in new ways to force ads, which I’m sure will be a different kind of intrusive, instead of trying to push their ownership into the space of the users systems.

Ok, but that’s for the EC and for presidential and VP nominees by the EC.

In the dnc we have delegates with 1 vote for their nominee. If the delegates vote for 1 dem and another gets the 2nd amount of votes, then they’d be Pres and VP nominees for the dnc. Or actually do ranked choice for dnc nominees to get voter ranking of nominees.

How is it better for a presidential nominee to pick who they want vs listening to the peoples actual preferences.

How would nominating a dem VP by Dems via voting cause a civil war?

And if it’s just for one party vs both, what would that be bad?

I get why it was changed for VP for the dem vs Republican nominee. But why wouldn’t we want, as a party, better representation on who we voted for.

Maybe it’s the time to go back to how things were when the US was founded. We have a vote and top two are President and VP nominees. Keeps the party aligned to what we actually care about and who we think is best, vs who the nominee or party thinks might be best.

More democratic this way