Yes, of course. The guy advocating against censorship and pro freedom of business must be a right winger. You do know, what the real right wingers will do, when they get these instruments into their hands? If not, you will probably find out soon in Brazil.

What? Brazil is driving censorship but we should not care nor discuss, because whataboutism in America? Last time I checked this was lemmy.world, not lemmy.US_centric_worldview

1. It is a court order for censorship. You may not like what is said on that platform, but it is still straight up suppression of anything the government defines as dangerous. If you do not consider that a problematic move just because you agree with that government for now, you are in for a nasty surprise.
2. If Brazil wants to shut down the service because of that: That is their right. Welcome to the same club as North Korea, China, and Iran. But what is that move with Starlink? When and where has it become acceptable to seize assets of a company because you have beef with one of its shareholders? What does this signal to other international activities in Brazil?

Because some 300 million people somewhere have problems with their courts, the rest of the world does not matter?

How about the last scrap of pretense at democratic rule of law? Just because someone you do not like is on the receiving end, you should not applaud the authoritarian government.

Ein Teil, vielleicht sogar alles, wird genutzt, um dir den Katalog physisch zu senden. Der Rest wird für die unzähligen Briefe, die Firmen und auch Privatleute damals geschrieben haben, benutzt. Kann man sich heute schwer vorstellen, aber die Post war früher für mehr als das Verteilen von Werbung da, kam in Großstädten 2x täglich statt 2x die Woche, und Briefkasten wurden alle paar Stunden geleert. Daher bekam man Briefmarken immer los, und ist praktischer zu verschicken als Münzen.