• 0 Posts
  • 60 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: October 14th, 2023

help-circle








  • GaMEChld@lemmy.worldtoTechnology@lemmy.worldShe Is in Love With ChatGPT
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    15 days ago

    Probably futile to discuss the health or ethics of it without first figuring out if people in the discussion share similar beliefs on what the meaning/purpose of life is.

    Cuz if you’re talking to a nihilist who thinks it’s all shadows and dust at the end of the day, you’ll get a very different discussion that someone who thinks family and procreation are the point of life.









  • I understand what you’re saying. The answer is yes, we choose when violence is justified.

    Lemmy doesn’t do well with nuanced discussion. The communication dilemma present is the lack of the bridge between where one party in the discussion wants to continue narrowing the parameters of discussion until we are left with a binary choice (the quantum side of discussion) and the other party wants to keep the discussion broad and cognizant of all the variables (the general relativity side of discussion).

    Both sides have valid reasons for existing. Usually you do have to narrow parameters in order to actually come up with a solution or action to implement. Similarly to how in a valid experiment you attempt to control all variables except what you’re testing. But you also have to be aware of all the variables in the first place to adequately control them.