• 0 Posts
  • 22 Comments
Joined 1 month ago
cake
Cake day: March 14th, 2025

help-circle


  • I think that tracks, the horse estrogen would have been good enough for estrogenic effects but bioidentical estrogen does better to trigger effects along the whole endocrine line. I know when my estrogen is in good levels it effects my progesterone cycle (in a good way) and progesterone in turn is commonly used to help round out breasts after tanner 4/5


  • Im having trouble parsing your first question, but I’ll take a crack anyway.

    I’d probably calculate tax based on what a vacant unit is available for, if it isn’t available could do something like last known rent adjusted for market or calculations based on property value.

    The idea being they’ll list it for rent at a reasonable rate instead of keeping it off the market or keeping rent high in order to fill units.

    Some dudes fourth property or a CEOs second apartment aren’t the problems with housing though. It’s investment capital grabbing properties and doing nothing with them. Buildings standing vacant because they weren’t profitable enough. Empty lots we won’t even let the homeless camp on.

    A number of these properties are essentially abandoned, forgotten about by bankrupt companies where ownership is on an unsorted piece of paper in a filing cabinet. We’ve got an “affordable apartment complex” out here the company stopped building on quietly after the publicity ran out and it was no longer cost effective.

    Resources hoarded and wasted for the rest of us to fight over scraps.









  • Everyone now owns wherever they are living. Current owner residents get reimbursed via taxes for their current equity over a period of time. People and government win, corporations take losses on investments and probably come out ahead anyway.

    Obviously an oversimplified idea, but I think we should be asking “How can we make this happen?” more often than dismissing outright.








  • Or in a resource based economy, production would be decided by the needs of the community at various scales and not driven by sales or profits.

    I think the ideal is a system that provides UBI, Nutritious food distribution, needs based housing, universal healthcare, and job services that provide aptitude testing, training and placement.

    If 30% can meet our needs, the other 70% should be sufficient to provide the system and framework and enough left over for consumption, luxury and still have room for meritocracy advancement.

    What’s the current wealth distribution? 10% holding 85% leaving the rest of us 15% only half of the 30 we need.


  • Food being wasted instead of given out. Clothing slashed and tossed away. Housing boarded up and left vacant in the name of investing.

    All in the name of maximizing sales and profit. Resources hoarded and wasted.

    30% of the worlds resources would be sufficient to meet everyone’s needs if properly distributed.

    But it’s not because corporations see a homeless man taking a sandwich out of the trash as a lost sale.