where to :3

You deserve an award for being an excellent parental figure. This is the kind of support kids around the world need more of.

The only thing one really needs.

:3

Don’t check what instance I’m on

But many commenters think they will just stop producing these laptops. You know, like my comment explains.

I’d like people to actually read the article before commenting. They are renaming their laptops. They’ll continue producing what would’ve been XPS.

Enough a proof that brains are more complex than a single processor calculating one thing at a time.

Furthermore, what about people who had lobotomy done to them? Weird things happen with two halves of the brain (now separate) “thinking” two different things at the same time!

Why think of intelligent solutions when you can just throw more money at the problem. Surely that’s how you deal with issues.

But can you detect the link being broken by someone other than your intended communication partner?

If A sends a particle to B, couldn’t M intercept A’s particle and send a different particle to B? Kind of like intercepting Diffie Hellman. A and B will both share some information with M, but not with each other.

So they’ve shown they can send light over a cable designed to transfer light.

The impressive thing is of course managing to get one specific photon to one specific location. Still, what benefits does that have over the standard encoding?

I guess this technique might have a lower error rate and higher distance, because it’s binary by nature with no quantization needed. But you don’t need the quantum entanglement part at all for this.

Edit: Reading is hard! This is indeed exciting for security. I wonder how it fairs against a very powerful MitM though.

They likely use adblocks themselves.

The wavey font got me!

This just in: Neurodivergent people are neurodivergent

Wearing a seatbelt in a moving vehicle does not magically prevent all deaths upon an accident. Do you recommend we should stop wearing seatbelts?

If there are measures in place that reduce the danger of something happening, it’s not wise to remove them just because they’re not 100% effective.

All I see is *******

deleted by creator

$48.99, the lowest I’ll go for you my friend

These actually look fantastic with the filter on. Another commenter’s examples were bad and I too thought it’s just nostalgia, since the filtered ones looked worse there. In particular, the skeleton you showed gains so much depth.

You’re right, my bad.

OP’s security concern is valid. Different CAs may differ in the challenges used to verify you to be the domain owner. Using something that you could crack may lead to an attacker’s public key being certified instead.

This could for example be the case with HTTPS verification (place a file with a specific content accessible through your URL) if the website has lacking input sanitization and/or creates files with the user’s input at an unfortunate location that collides with the challenge.

This attack vector might be far-fetched, but there can certainly be differences between different signing authorities.