Ha. Reminds me of those spinny things you put above an infants crib.

its going to be okay

bet

Me summoning unamed kittens. Magically 119,334 kitties and to cuddle with.

A shallow grave- or wherever they’re gonna deport queer folk to, too.

I imagine, in the event no one ever knew, found out, or cared about the swap, then life would go on, just a bit more weird than before. I can’t imagine it in a modern society, even briefly. We have too many records of too many things. And beyond that, it’d depend on stuff like who they are and how long it’s been. Maybe on how readily both of them can convince people that they are mentally sound and worthy of respect. Who knows? That’d be wild.

Unrelated, but I think the fair folk used to swap infants out with ugly versions, or dying versions? Am I mixing up fairies and the UNSC again?

Respond to comments like this! I have a wealth of time saved up cuz of it

Photography trends and insights from 2024 are here!

I would never reveal myself because have you met people? I would absolutely be tortured for fun lmao

Haha train go up

Hmm, yes, very wise.

This is an interesting idea. A terrible implementation, but that’s just because 50-100 feral bots can outperform a human on most any digital metric.Things humans can do that bots can’t tend to be really thinky, and so don’t make good, easy checks.

I, personally, believe we’ll be shoved off the greater Internet by bots and malicious automation one day. There’s no solution that isn’t “fight and lose” But yeah, interesting idea!

Not quite, you wanna try again? Pay attention this time:

The question is “What types or brands of edibles make you want to draw?”

ha, gotem

Maybe look up atheism then try correcting your own comment instead of theirs :)

In all seriousness, I think your definitions are a few centuries out of date. It’s been drifting toward meaning a-gnostic instead of undecided. Contemporarily, it’s used to explain one’s believed level of knowledge on a claim. I can, for instance, be agnostic toward plate tectonics, and be made gnostic of them by evidence.

“Why! Do users! Dislike! The use! Of emojis! On Lemmy!?”

Overused, they’re just so tiring too read. I think, if you’re gonna go that hard, just full send hieroglyphics and drop the text aspect.

“walk the bird” has cursed crossover potential with my understanding of British slang

Are you aware of medicine? It’s pretty rude to say “im not disabled like you. It’d be wrong for you to not suffer,” as you did.

Now THIS is podracing

IF you define taking and shrinking a corpse’s. head as a violation of the rights of that corpse’s human rights, then yes. Of course, I disagree with most of what you asserted. I guess my first two questions are “Why does a corpse get rights?” and really just… generally… with the moral system thing. If one feels “the environment” is more important than a human, then they should be pro-kill-all-humans?? I’m not sure that tracks. Most societies have a moral system that’s a little more complicated than “destroy everything that’s not the most morally significant to protect it from being hurt by less moral things.”

Anyway, interesting question! Maybe we should talk about corpse rights as a new category of rights? Less important, perhaps, than living humans, but more important than nothing?

…nonexistant?