The true skilled arguer. Upset that I tell you what you have or have not done and then proceed to do the exact same thing.

You didn’t answer the question. Regardless of who’s more right, the end result is the same. There are diversity “goals or mandates” whatever you want to call it. So you are actively looking for people to fill roles based on protected characteristics. Do you not agree this is a direct contradiction of the civil rights act of 1962?

You have taken zero FEDERAL DEI training programs. This is obvious by the article you linked and your comment. DEI had no effect outside of working in a federal position or federal contractor. Honestly if I were you I’d be embarrassed of this post. Of course that was when I thought I was on lemmy. I didn’t realize the education level had already dipped to reddit levels.

Btw the DEI explicitly contradicts the civil rights act of 1962 and the protected characteristics of hiring someone and actually makes them the deciding factor. So maybe do 10 mins of research and you will probably change your mind. I understand independent research is difficult but I promise the payoff is worth it.

Your statement is not based on fact. The DEI created metrics that federal employment and federal contractors were required to meet related to DEI.

it’s more on the lines of, one of the women quit so we can only interview women because otherwise we won’t meet our required diversity goal.

Your statement is the dream goal and not the actual case.