bane_killgrind

🙄 this is interesting? Is there no new application or topology here?

If it’s just “more power vroom” this is only valuable for entertainment.

It’s more like “idiot billionaire builds bigger shiny gadget for a non specific purpose”

Like what’s the problem being solved here?

Ewww

Adnoun

When we said give the people what they want, we got this, and we do.

you don’t talk about salary within earshot of the boss, you don’t badmouth company decisions within earshot of the boss

Or, do these things all the time if you can base your working hours around making your company more money.

It got cold

Prior to launch, we agreed to a comprehensive set of rules to govern image creation, including that people in images be fully clothed.

Apparently they thought about it, but neglected to think that some “vacation” images in the training data might not be tagged with the clothing worn or that the model might sometimes consider only pants to be fully clothed because some of the training data might show topless women in public and not be tagged. Or topless men.

Yeah it does… Epic doesn’t have a big stick like the whole court system to punish Apple.

The prosecutor does.

Epic wasn’t prosecuting.

Yeah don’t do that

Basically collecting information on the movement of documents is a security risk in itself.

Papers in a flaming trash can are secured. Not much else.

I deal with consumer data analytics, and the scheme that you are positing does expose the frequency and density of specific actors and their access to classified information. This is really valuable, you can tell when someone gets a promotion and maybe has access to more info then they are used to or some other exploitable paradigm.

If it’s just a printed barcode sure, it could be tracked like this without exposing information. Trouble is that classified documents are living documents, and the information only becomes classified when it’s collected by some operative or officer, who may or may not register the documents with this central tracking authority.

The next issue is the capability of the central tracking authority to review, access, curate all of the reports that it has received, and their confidence that their internal staff do not breach the access rules on these documents hello Snowden.

If this is about the concept of investigators being heavily siloed into independent investigations about the same crime… No this is the opposite. There are no investigators, because there is basically zero information about the activities.

He ate papers he has been intentionally obscuring the information he’s had access to the entire time that he’s been receiving privileged information.

I like that book, but it’s been long enough you will have to lead me into the parallel you are making.

With long range RFID readers existing that is bad opsec. You don’t need to know the contents of a document to exploit it’s dissemination, in certain cases.

Philip k dick is SciFi I think you mean Orwell

I disagree with you because there should be strong opsec around certain topics, and auditors aren’t the author of the documents, they are a 3rd party tracking their dissemination.

For real, it’s probably because some classified docs can’t be tracked in an auditable format because the auditors would not have clearance to know those documents exist or any other info about them.

Yeah that’s about the right level of normie.