No, conservatism, as formulated by Edmund Burke in his attack against the French Revolution.

Because the original doesn’t really have a lot of predatory monetisation. They are having GTAO wet dreams thinking about how to monetise their most popular game of the franchise with the excuse of doing it as a remake.

The Russia which has attacked and invaded its neighbour?

This is fairly benign compared to the AI generated slop which is now in the process of taking over every social media.

Or grow out of it altogether. Plenty of much better alternatives.

I think you need to be American. It is funny how the Americans are busy explaining the drug to you, but failing to understand that it is the underlying premise that most non-Americans won’t get.

That seems to be his superpower. He is so blatantly and unashamedly despicable that he emboldens every asshole on Earth to stop holding back on their assholery, but instead flaunt it like never before.

“If he can do it, why shouldn’t I do it as well?”

I don’t see how that makes any difference at all. Trump himself has told them what he is about at his rallies, completely unedited and unfiltered. They support him because of that.

Nah, way earlier than 2024. In fact ever since the “grab them by the pussy” tape was released before the election in 2016, these miserable bastards knew what he was about and still chose to support him. No decency to be found among them from that point on.

But that is the point, they are not fighting over it.

Apparently they have to make sure even the most dimwitted has recieved the notice that Elon Musk “definitely isn’t part of this administration anymore, pinky swear and everything”.

Has their medicaid program been unaffected by the Trump cuts?

Platforming this shitstain only serves his purpose.

The bread and circus would need to go away first, so probably never going to happen.

It definitely is. The Czechs not wanting a Russian company to build their nuclear plants is apparently russophobia to this orc propaganda central.

Not necessary. They pay him a lot of money for saying it.

Someone’s age is showing.

Even if you love porn and grew up exposed to it as a kid, you gotta admit that there are psychological effects on avid adult viewers and more on minors.

No you don’t. That is right wing propaganda completely unfounded by science. That porn addiction nonsense so many Americans babble about is a product of that propaganda, and doesn’t actually exist.

That is not really something you can say with certainty. Products you buy can easily have had materials or services from the EU involved somewhere in the production chain, and regardless of how far out in that chain they are, those tariffs will fall on you to pay as the end product consumer.

That is not what they are saying. It is perfectly valid to say that there are zero contemporary primary sources to confirm the existence of Jesus. Historians have come to the consensus that he most likely existed, on account of the influence stemming from later sources, but they all also know there are no contemporary sources, so that consensus is based on circumstantial evidence.

The historicity of Paul is not robust, it is definitely better sourced than Jesus, but that historicity stems from himself, and as we cannot take his supernatural religous experiences for fact (he can very well have believed them as fact, but we know that they cannot have happened in objective reality like that), he is not exactly the most reliable witness in the first place.