Spray with that Scotchguard stuff you waterproof shoes with. Seals the mold out.

15 year old crack.

You’re not even wrong.

You could and would probably have a point.

But it doesn’t make it ok for you just because someone else did before.

Your hypocrisy is the point here.

A philosophy that should not be forced on another animal against their nature.

There’s some hypocrisy here!

Yeah smoked it a couple of times. Wasn’t as good as expected. We were all quite in to party drugs, ie ecstasy, speed, coke, acid etc. The buzz on crack wasn’t a patch on a good trip!

Tit for tat with some forgiving, even more so. I’m attempting the ‘forgiving’ part.

I’m prepared to lose contact with people that are problematic or toxic, especially those with the more radical views, but it’s not nice to watch someone I’ve known for many years gradually lose all their friends for similar reasons.

While I do completely agree with all your points, I don’t see what I can learn from mocking someones ‘wonky lip’ or ‘saggy eye lids’ for example.

And for context, this isn’t a new issue, it’s been brought up a good few times over the last year or so.

No it’s not. It’s how to help someone recognize toxic traits and hope they want to stop.

If they were to see that behavior as toxic but wish to continue with it anyway, that’s fine. It just won’t be around me any more.

Thank you for the excellent response!

The problem seems to be a mental disconnect they just cant overcome.

Immediately after criticizing some racist news story (so not all bad!) they then mocked the reporter or news reader for their appearance.

I pointed out the hypocrisy of that being just the same as how racism starts. I don’t think it sunk in in any meaningful way though.

Based on many other things, and that was my first response too, I don’t think they are capable of self reflection enough for that to sink in.

Seems to be a worrying trend these days.

I tried that kind of approach yesterday.

Their response was to mock someone else on TV.

I’ve mentioned it a couple of times now. Last time I told them even if they cant see the issue with it, it bothers me and other people, so cut it out.

The response was something like “yeah other person says that to me too”.

That’s when I start to wonder why I bothered.

That’s fair enough, but it seems it should be obvious that the weighting of browser choice, not moral for most, it’s a browser, and massive diet change based entirely on subjective morality are just not comparable.

Suggesting a browser or bashing a corporate brand are not the same as encouraging morally driven life choices. Is that not obvious?

A quarter century of shameless piracy! Now that’s something to celebrate!

Still mainly use them!