How so?
Ideally, if one company charged too much for rent, the person living there could move to another place owned by a different company that would charge cheaper rent, in an effort to take business from the first company.
The issue arrives when monopolies control the majority of homes, but those monopolies can be broken much more easily if the cost of buying homes went down (from an increased supply of them) and the barrier to entry of new homeowners who want to rent went down. That would increase competition and would eliminate these monopolies.
Depends on what kinda right wingers your talking about Ik a few people who believe in more laissez-faire free market economic policies, and they’re pretty chill
If you wanted bread to be cheaper, you would increase the supply of bread. If you want homes to be cheaper, increase the amount of homes. It might not be the issue at hand, but it definitely is a valid solution.
if you make more homes, then the value of each home individually would drop.
Lots of people buy homes as an investment, its not only large corporations that do this, and if someone bought a home expecting that when they sell it they will get most of their money back, or even a profit on it, they would really be harmed by a government guaranteeing effectively free housing for all. If you want such a world to exist, it can’t be done instantly for sure
This is effectively the same as the government paying some of the cost of making houses. Meaning that if they make more houses, they get ‘paid’ by the government, by paying less taxes. They pocket the savings because that is what the government gave to incentivize them making more homes.
No one who owns a home would vote for them. It’s not in their self interest, if they spent 300k on a house and this happened, they would lose ~300k. Not worth it at all. A much better idea would be to just have tax breaks for contractors making new homes, that would lower the value of everyone else’s homes, but by a lot less.
I think a major problem with the stock market is the lack of long term planing. And we see that clearly with what’s happened to Boeing with their planes falling apart
they didn’t have to nuke civilians but using nukes was a good idea overall
I think its like sugar, too much and it’s horrible but in moderation its fine
yeah this just means more targeted ads for me I don’t want the world knowing what I ate for breakfast and I don’t want the world knowing that I gave my friend some money this wouldn’t free anyone of anything
they could hide a crypto miner in it, if you look at the numbers for some currencies this can actually make similar kinds of cash compared to ad revenue
And what happens when the state gets controlled by someone who doesn’t like what you have to say? You go homeless?
how about weapons manufacturers?
yeah but python is super slow
what would be the alternative? if someones super rich and commits a crime, and the punishment is just a fine, it wont really affect them
nibbler
I asked this guy on a live stream once about whats the shape of the earth and he told me it could be anything I wanted it. He got my vote.