It sounds way less offensive to those who decry the original terminology’s problematic roots but still keeps its meaning intact.
You must log in or register to comment.
That doesn’t make sense depending on the context. New I2C standard switched to controller/target for example. This conveys that one device is controlling the other devices.
My suggestion doesn’t make sense in the classic PATA sense either, since there were potentially several “slave” devices, but they weren’t slaves so much as dependent on the “master.”
Parent/child(ren)(s)
i saw main/clone for storage once
