It sounds way less offensive to those who decry the original terminology’s problematic roots but still keeps its meaning intact.

    • @usrtrv@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      294 months ago

      That doesn’t make sense depending on the context. New I2C standard switched to controller/target for example. This conveys that one device is controlling the other devices.

      • kate
        link
        fedilink
        English
        54 months ago

        i saw main/clone for storage once

      • @s38b35M5@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        94 months ago

        My suggestion doesn’t make sense in the classic PATA sense either, since there were potentially several “slave” devices, but they weren’t slaves so much as dependent on the “master.”

    • DontTakeMySky
      link
      fedilink
      104 months ago

      I have my primary, and my secondary, and my secondary secondary.

      Leader/follower works though.

  • Cap
    link
    fedilink
    344 months ago

    We’ve been using Master/Bater down at the church.

  • @Limonene@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    74 months ago

    I’ve seen “Domain Controller” and “Subscriber” for the sake of plausible deniability.

    In the case of SPI, they want to keep intact the names MISO (master in, slave out) and MOSI. So they use things like “Main” and “Sub”.

    • @SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      74 months ago

      Primary and secondary are usually peers, where the secondary takes over when the primary isn’t functioning. Which isn’t the same relationship, as the master/slave terminology indicates that if the master fails, the slave will also fail.

      Parent/child is probably a better way to describe this kind of relationship.

      • Saik0
        link
        fedilink
        English
        14 months ago

        Parent/child is probably a better way to describe this kind of relationship.

        Not quite as child presumes a ultimate reliance on a parent.

        In master/slave (harddrive configurations) you can promote EITHER drive to master and use the other as slave. It doesn’t matter which is master. Just that they both configured correctly in regards to the other.

        Parent/Child doesn’t really accommodate for that quirk.

    • BarrierWithAshes
      link
      fedilink
      -124 months ago

      Yeah this will just piss off the anti-porn/right-wing/tradcath(?) types instead of leftist/neolib/anti-racist types.

    • osaerisxero
      link
      fedilink
      504 months ago

      Leaving aside the problematic nature of the existing terms, the result was that people actually thought a little more about the relationships the things had and started using better/more precise terminology for the relationships: primary/secondary, active/hot/cold, parent/child, etc.

      Net positive all round.

      • Mellow
        link
        fedilink
        English
        304 months ago

        Woah there. You’re using about 25% more of your brain than the rest of the internet. We’re gonna need you to tone that reasonability down a bit.

        I look forward to setting up my next polyamorous network connection. I can wait for the commands nmcli con choke me daddy ens1 thrupple0

      • @fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        144 months ago

        This exactly. M/S ment nothing to me messing with HDDs as a kid.

        It arguably only makes sense in a control node/ worker node context, but worker is ob