It sounds way less offensive to those who decry the original terminology’s problematic roots but still keeps its meaning intact.

  • @SomeoneSomewhere@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    213 months ago

    The issue is acronyms; there’s millions of products, schematics, datasheets, and manuals that refer to them as MISO and MOSI with no further explanation. Any new standard that doesn’t fit runs into the 15-competing-standards problem, and ought to be followed by an “AKA MISO” every time it’s used.