China has 21 nuclear reactors under construction which will have a capacity for generating more than 21 gigawatts of electricity, according to the International Atomic Energy Agency. That is two and a half times more nuclear reactors under construction than any other country.

I love that China is not planning to power all future demand with more coal and gas.

  • @fubo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    31 year ago

    Do you have reason to believe China is not taking safety seriously in there nuclear energy program?

    If the China government were doing the wrong thing, would Chinese scientists and engineers be safe to say so, or would they be subject to imprisonment and torture for disagreeing with their political superiors?

    Without freedom of political speech there is no freedom to tell the truth on matters of political controversy. This includes environmental and safety issues.

    • NoneOfUrBusiness
      link
      fedilink
      31 year ago

      That’s kind of true, but the Chinese government is probably competent enough to not mess with nuclear safety.

    • @lntl@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      -81 year ago

      I get it, you don’t like China. They’re still a big player in global emissions and I’m still glad they’re not meeting their complete energy demand with coal/ng. You should be too.

      The ability of chinese scientists and engineers to act in their roles without interference from the state is offtopic. If you want to talk about that, go make a thread about it.

      • xep
        link
        fedilink
        5
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        ability of chinese scientists and engineers to act in their roles without interference from the state

        In a discussion about plant safety that is relevant, surely.

    • @zephyreks@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      2
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Yes? Unlike in the US, whether to care about safety or health aren’t political issues.

      Also, the punishment for severely fucking up isn’t a small fine or imprisonment, it’s execution. If Fukushima happened in China, heads would literally roll. That’s a pretty strong incentive to not fuck up from the plant manager/architect/designer standpoint.

    • CrimeDadA
      link
      fedilink
      English
      51 year ago

      It goes the other way too. The Chinese government harshly punishes those who take dangerous shortcuts that undermine public safety and trust. The 2008 baby formula scandal comes to mind, which led to the execution of two executives for their crimes.

      Anyway, nuclear power has proven to be very safe under all types of government. To say that it would somehow be less safe in China is maybe just a little bit sinophobic.

        • CrimeDadA
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 year ago

          A roughly equivalent disaster also happened in the anti-communist free state of Japan. What’s your point?

          • Throwaway
            link
            fedilink
            11 year ago

            That took an earthquake and a tsunami to happen. Chernobyl was a test to see if it the plant was built to spec, and it wasn’t.

            • CrimeDadA
              link
              fedilink
              English
              11 year ago

              In the case of the Chernobyl disaster, the test revealed a flaw in the design of the reactor, not a deviation from the specification. Likewise, in the Fukushima disaster, it was a tsunami that revealed a flaw in the design of the reactor cooling system and backup generators.

              • Throwaway
                link
                fedilink
                11 year ago

                The flaw being graphite tips on the control rods which was not in the design.

                • CrimeDadA
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  1
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  The graphite ends were part of the RMBK design and the power surge behavior caused by them was observed previously at a reactor in Lithuania (but no accident occured). The design was not changed at that point because the particular circumstances that would lead to an accident (like what happened in the Chernobyl disaster) were determined to be too unlikely. A similar determination must have been made regarding the likelihood of a flood that would disable the emergency generators at Fukushima.