And I’m being serious. I feel like there might be an argument there, I just don’t understand it. Can someone please “steelman” that argument for me?

  • nickwitha_k (he/him)
    link
    fedilink
    38 hours ago

    That’s the fallacy of Denying the Correlative. In the FPTP system, there were two choices and only two.

    • CrimeDadA
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -14 hours ago

      To an individual voter in a large electorate the idea that a Harris loss would ensure a Trump victory isn’t relevant except as an excuse to vote immorally for Harris, the genocide candidate. The only moral choices were to abstain or vote for an explicitly anti-genocide candidate.