essell@lemmy.world to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · edit-27 days agoIt's a rule that the existence of vegan shoes implies the existence of carnivorous shoeslemmy.worldexternal-linkmessage-square79fedilinkarrow-up1318arrow-down142
arrow-up1276arrow-down1external-linkIt's a rule that the existence of vegan shoes implies the existence of carnivorous shoeslemmy.worldessell@lemmy.world to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · edit-27 days agomessage-square79fedilink
minus-squaredejected_warp_core@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up6arrow-down1·6 days agoNo. Instead, it implies that eating this shoe is better for your health than eating a non-vegan one.
minus-squareBigDanishGuy@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up2·6 days agoDo we have a term for individuals that refrain from eating shoes? Because vegan shoe or not, I identify as a person who doesn’t eat shoes.
No. Instead, it implies that eating this shoe is better for your health than eating a non-vegan one.
Do we have a term for individuals that refrain from eating shoes? Because vegan shoe or not, I identify as a person who doesn’t eat shoes.