• bcoffy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I wonder how practical it would be to recommission old nuclear aircraft carriers as cargo ships

        • snooggums@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          It is far more than that.

          It needs to be cost effective (which might include profotabilit6), be feasible to implement, sustainable, and a bunch of other stuff too.

          Aircraft carriers and subs being the only transportationethod using nuclear is a good sign that it isn’t practical for shipping. That is likely a combination of nuclear requiring highly trained staff that are not just out in the work force, the ability to procure a reactor and maintenance parts, the ability to obtain fissible material, the ability to dry dock a ship with a nuclear reactor, and a bunch of other stuff that could even be affordable without being practical for reasons beyond costs.

      • ElectricAirship@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        We don’t always do the most practical thing though.

        For instance lateen sails are not the best sail design but is used by every sail manufacturer currently.

        • snooggums@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Best depends on many factors beyond things like efficiency, weight, or durability. Lateen sails are easy to implement with a single mast, are easy to store and maintain, and everyone that has sailed has experience with them. Other sails might do a better job of catching the wind, but with tradeoffs on maintenance and usability.

          Practicality is often complex and leans towards easier maintenance and established knowledge.